"...If doctors were paid less,
the quality of medicine would decrease.  ..." - MB

Perhaps in a culture that deifies avarice...otherwise, this too is but
an assumption.

On Apr 9, 1:15 pm, Michael Berkovits <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is not accurate to say that people who go into medicine are
> motivated by a "personal attachment to money."  In that, Orn, we are
> in agreement.
>
> But the fact remains that it's a factor.  If doctors were paid less,
> the quality of medicine would decrease.  I went to good schools, and
> most of my friends went into various professions like medicine and the
> law.  Many of them liked, and could have done, either.  You can help
> people and find intellectual fulfillment in lots of different fields.
> If the salary of one decreases, it becomes less attractive relative to
> the others.
>
> On Apr 7, 10:48 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "...so they have to be compensated by a lot to make the profession
> > economically worthwhile. If doctors were paid
> > less, more people who would otherwise be doctors would become lawyers,
> > and medical care wouldn't be as good as it is now. ...." - MB
>
> > so many assumptions, so little time...
>
> > Personally, I find any professional who is motivated by amassing a
> > fortune to be suspect at the core.
>
> > The motivation for MDs ...in the US at least, most likely is not based
> > on a personal attachment to money...many other things, yes, but I'd
> > bet less for the former. Perhaps that is the motivation of many who
> > push others into the profession...
>
> > Perhaps medical care would be better if the motivation were
> > otherwise...an analogy is the economy...etc.
>
> > On Apr 7, 7:32 am, Michael Berkovits <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Agree with Molly.  I don't understand any of the financial arguments
> > > presented.
>
> > > Some people cut trees down for a living, and make a certain amount of
> > > money per year doing it.  Some people lend money for a living, and
> > > make a certain amount of money per year doing it.  In the former case,
> > > you trade the trees for money.  In the latter case, it's the
> > > difference between what the borrowing rate and the interest rate that
> > > lets you make money.  Nothing immoral about it. Only reason some
> > > people, and various religions, feel that charging interest is immoral
> > > is because of the fact that we didn't really evolve to understand
> > > abstract ways of making money.  Sell wood? Sure.  Make a living off a
> > > spread? Harder to understand. But why immoral?
>
> > > As for medicine: Why are doctors paid so much? Because they're among
> > > the more talented people in society (i.e., intelligent - look at
> > > medical school acceptance rates), and they spend much longer in
> > > training than other people, so they have to be compensated by a lot to
> > > make the profession economically worthwhile. If doctors were paid
> > > less, more people who would otherwise be doctors would become lawyers,
> > > and medical care wouldn't be as good as it is now. So where would the
> > > morality be in that? Is every potential doctor who chooses to be a
> > > lawyer because the pay's better an immoral person?
>
> > > On Apr 7, 2:55 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Frayed knot is an interesting way of putting it.
>
> > > > I think society is more immoral than moral. I think most people agree 
> > > > that
> > > > killing some one is wrong.  My problem  with morality is when some one
> > > > charges excessive interest like in credit cards (my wife and I have one 
> > > > --
> > > > and it is for emergencies only  -- then immediately paid off )  
> > > > justifying
> > > > this as sound business when in reality to me it seems like this greed 
> > > > is a
> > > > way of slowly killing some one, or Like ( i do  have a very good health
> > > > insurance.) when I ended up in the hospital a few years back in the USA 
> > > > and
> > > > the bill exceeded $8,000. for 24 hour stay..  basically to get my heart 
> > > > beat
> > > > stabilized and watched. I saw 2 doctors for a total of 10 minutes..
> > > > If I did not have insurance i would have an huge medical bill and to 
> > > > pay it
> > > > I would have had to take food of my table to pay the bill. To me if a 
> > > > person
> > > > is forced to pay an excessive amount to cover a bill cutting back on 
> > > > normal
> > > > expenses to pay it,, the hospital is killing that person.
>
> > > > or by charging excessive rent.. or a myriad of other ways of killing 
> > > > some
> > > > one legally .. the slower the better..
>
> > > > On my savings account I am paid a meager 2.6 % but if I want to borrow 
> > > > money
> > > > I have to pay 9.8% If I depended upon that interest for my living again
> > > > corporate greed would be killing me..  and this difference is immoral 
> > > > yet it
> > > > is easily justified as business.
>
> > > > I think people many people only want to appear to be moral  yet at the 
> > > > same
> > > > time want to use business or corporations to hide their immorality.
>
> > > > The only conclusion I can reach is people prefer to be immoral. Just 
> > > > talking
> > > > the talk not walking the walk of morality.
>
> > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> 
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > Evil reconciled to good?  Frayed knot!
>
> > > > > On Apr 5, 10:18 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Why is evil always so hard to nail down or why does it seem that no
> > > > > > one really wants to identify it but simply dissect the potentiality 
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > what it may define. You don't consider anything on the video as evil
> > > > > > but do recognize it as bad, horrifying and obscene, which basically
> > > > > > covers the face of evil, but rather bypass evil representation to
> > > > > > bring attention to religious aspects, which by the way I agree with
> > > > > > 100%, don't burn your steak here. The dark ages are still upon us
> > > > > > brother and while technology creates a vision of advancement,
> > > > > > attitudes and behaviours create a different picture, the picture of
> > > > > > reality, of good and of evil.  I feel we must somehow find resolve 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > the issue of what is evil.  We have here a collection of brilliant
> > > > > > minds, myself excluded lol, and so we can somehow be assertive in 
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > resolve.  I find too many threads wind up as fray ends.  Which 
> > > > > > reminds
> > > > > > me of a thread that walked into a bar, the bartender said "we don't
> > > > > > serve threads", so the thread walked out, shredded out it's end and
> > > > > > tied itself into a loop, walked back into the bar, the bartender
> > > > > > noticed and immediately and irately said, "damn, I told you we don't
> > > > > > serve threads in here", the thread responded "I'm not a thread" at
> > > > > > which the bartender scowled, "you are so" and so the thread having 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > last word said "nope, I'm a frayed knot".
>
> > > > > > On Apr 5, 12:26 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Thanks Slip.  I don't really consider what is going on in the 
> > > > > > > video
> > > > > > > and what it represents as evil.  It is bad, it is horrifying, it 
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > obscene, but it is also no more than religion battling it's 
> > > > > > > fiercest
> > > > > > > foe -- education and enlightenment.  On the other hand, religion
> > > > > > > considers education and enlightenment evil -- the work of the 
> > > > > > > devil.
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 4, 2:05 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the video gruff, it was overwhelmingly sad but very
> > > > > > > > enlightening as to the seriousness and the dilemma of these 
> > > > > > > > people.
> > > > > It
> > > > > > > > takes me back over to the other thread, Does Evil Exist.  One 
> > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > needs to watch this video for the answer.
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 4, 3:38 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Here is a good reason for moral behavior -- call it what you 
> > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > (we
> > > > > > > > > are our brother's keeper, the golden rule, do unto others, 
> > > > > > > > > etc.) --
> > > > >http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/02/22/world/asia/1194838044017/cl...
>
> > > > --
> > > > (
> > > >  )
> > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to