Good Rosey  I am glad to hear you are safe and will remain that way.
Now about :

Just wait until they found out I have doubts in faith.

Lol  I know those feelings well ..  ah the tribunals of christianity.. those
that say "Bless me father for I have not sinned but let me tell you about
Allan... "
Interesting times lay ahead Rosey , . Your guardian will be there to help
you and guide you.
Allan & Patches


On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Thank you Allan, I'll be OK.  There is nothing to worry about.  I just
> don't like being in the middle as relaying information can sometimes
> be lethal.  Especially the things people say when they are angry and
> don't necessarily mean.
>
> Just wait until they found out I have doubts in faith.
>
> On Apr 29, 6:21 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I do not envy you Rosey  The people who seem to lead or at least those
> that
> > are in the news seem to be very frightening people, In christianity those
> > activities are known as witch hunts where people (often leaders) accuse
> > others of wrong doing.. I think that most of the time it is to draw
> > attention away from their own activity It has been my experience in the
> past
> > that the character defects I see in others are in reality my own
> defects..
> > but the same applies to others accusing me,,  can be a very quick
> insight.
> >
> > I do not think paranoia has never changed.  The US used peoples peoples
> > justified fears to create paranoia and justify the Bush (Iraq) war.
> > unfortunately it has been that way for eons.. it seems to be  a common
> > thread or weapon for controlling the masses.
> >
> > Kind people are often taken advantage of, I know from first hand
> experience.
> >
> > When I hear or read justifications for hurting some one  i see the works
> of
> > men covering up their wrong doing.  Rosey please take care and do not get
> > yourself hurt. My wife tells me I worry a lot,, and as for you I worry
> about
> > your safety .
> > Allan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > No, we wouldn't want Slip on Saturn.  I guess Tink, what or how my
> > > frame of mind has come to the conclusion that specific men will
> > > inevitably return to evil tendencies is due to the misinterpretation
> > > of intentions.  I have good intentions and have been accused of
> > > thinking or doing things that I would never imagine nor wish to embark
> > > upon.  To be quite honest, there are rare occasions where I've even
> > > accused people of having bad intentions.  And there have been times
> > > where the accusations were justified, overall people are paranoid.
> >
> > > Has this paranoia changed much in the last millenium or two?  Has the
> > > human being really overcome this obstacle, even by short shot?
> >
> > > I am not saying this so that I can continue to argue a point that I
> > > doubt collective mentality will ever be a universal objective and take
> > > its course.  I say this because we need to find solutions as to how
> > > the human being can evolve into a being negative of paranoia,
> > > jealousy, anger, manipulative tactics for gain, and hierarchial
> > > stance.
> >
> > > My mother always told me that I am too soft, forgiving, and giving of
> > > a person.  A person is weak for having such qualities?  The word she
> > > used was Mathhaka, (a person that let's others take advantage of).  I
> > > am not weak, as a matter of fact I am quite content with my persona.
> > > Currently facing issues of familial discord where I am in the middle.
> > > Unfortunately being a messenger I find is the most difficult task a
> > > person can enter as it wrings ones soul dry.  I don't feel right
> > > having to be in the middle.  To me if one feels guilty for their
> > > actions, it's their soul begging them to stop.  I am trying wiith all
> > > my power not to make things worse.  I am this close to disassociating
> > > myself altogether.  I don't have to put up with it.  Physically and
> > > mentally exhausting.  But situations like this display people at their
> > > worst, I must say when a person is angry they are capable of stripping
> > > a mountain from its peak.
> >
> > > How can collective mentality curb anger?  In Islam, when a man states
> > > to his wife that he is going to divorce her in anger, it is not
> > > regarded as a qualifiable action.  Only because one would have to
> > > determine whether it was said in a conscious state of mind, or in
> > > anger.  If in anger, then it is forgivable, because it's not something
> > > that one intends.
> >
> > > Point is, can man tame emotion?
> >
> > > On Apr 27, 10:39 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Rosey,
> > > > I understand that the people you refer to as purely evil are
> > > > despicable human beings.
> > > > But they are human beings, and they are what they are because of the
> > > > values (or lack of) they have acquired in their Life.
> > > > I just have an aversion to the word and idea of 'evil' because it
> > > > excuses the human from responsibility.
> > > > Psycho/sociopath is as close as a human gets to the idea of evil.
> >
> > > > We don't have to get through to them. The Collective Mentality we're
> > > > talking about establishing 'will' get through to them.
> > > > We are not talking about selling a bunch of dogma, we are talking
> > > > about establishing a link in our minds that will bring the power of
> > > > our collective intelligence (God?) to bear on the actions of mankind.
> >
> > > > Slip said, "I think one of the key factors in the collective
> mentality
> > > > obstacle is
> > > > the lack of insight into "post collective mentality".
> > > > What I think he's saying is you are not looking at the possibility.
> > > > Like a scientist has a vision or object in his mind first, then
> begins
> > > > to figure ways to make it real. Where would we be today if all the
> > > > scientist had your attitude of "Oh we could never do that".
> >
> > > > We are looking to bring about an evolutionary leap for mankind.
> Please
> > > > release your primitive view of the human and look to the possibility
> > > > of overcoming the base mentality and evolving to a truly spiritual
> > > > people.
> > > > Imagine utopia, think from that point of view. What is necessary to
> > > > establish unity?
> >
> > > > And it needs to happen soon, cause we don't want slip to go back to
> > > > Saturn :-)
> > > > He wouldn't be happy without morning glories.
> >
> > > > peace & Love
> >
> > > > On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Tinker, I get what you're saying, but when I mention "pure evil" I
> am
> > > > > referring to the leaders of countries.  Few of them, very few,
> would
> > > > > agree with a collective mentality altogether.  The problem is
> getting
> > > > > through to them.  Yes we the plebians, patrons, citizens... are
> > > > > starving for peace and humanity, but who is listening to us?  As
> long
> > > > > as we have leaders that strive on maintaining power who are unable
> to
> > > > > equally share in thoughts, borders and resources, we are going to
> have
> > > > > followers that will believe in them.  That's the truth.  War
> > > > > unfortunately reigns over sound mind.  It's a paranoid caveman
> > > > > instinct which evolution has yet to mutate.  Am I for collective
> > > > > mentality?  100%, do I believe it will actualize anytime soon, no.
> > > > > It's going to take time.
> >
> > > > > On Apr 26, 5:13 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Rosey,
> > > > > > Your thinking that allows for someone to be "pure evil" is the
> sort
> > > of
> > > > > > stuff that is used to justify war. There is fear driven greed
> that
> > > > > > would apparently be the pure evil that you would substantiate.
> But,
> > > it
> > > > > > is 'purely' fear driven greed.
> >
> > > > > > The people of the world do not cater to war. We are subjected to
> war
> > > > > > by the fear driven greedy who have taken control of our
> government.
> >
> > > > > > What mother nature does is just fine. If we establish the
> collective
> > > > > > mentality we will come more in line with mother nature's natural
> > > order
> > > > > > and maybe even have a bit of influence :-) For sure we would
> handle
> > > > > > disasters a lot better.
> >
> > > > > > The ideas for a Collective Mentality have never made any
> significant
> > > > > > progress across barriers of Language and Culture.
> > > > > > So we should give up trying to find the way to make a world wide
> > > > > > collective mentality?
> >
> > > > > > Religions support the fatalistic prognosis. It would not give
> them
> > > > > > much authority if they didn't teach "there's nothing we can
> > > > > > do" (instill apathy) except follow their dogma.
> >
> > > > > > A code of rules will never will never establish a collective
> > > > > > mentality. That would be too complex to cross the barriers of
> Culture
> > > > > > and Language.
> >
> > > > > > peace & Love
> >
> > > > > > On Apr 26, 10:40 am, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Applause Slip, prior to responding to this thread I initially
> > > planned
> > > > > > > to agree with the collective mentality idea.  As I am not one
> that
> > > is
> > > > > > > pro war.  To me war is greed, power and an agenda to eliminate
> the
> > > > > > > enemy.  War is heartache and pain.  But when you have too many
> > > people
> > > > > > > whose intentions of others are nothing but pure evil, how shall
> we
> > > > > > > acquire this collective mentality.  Although signs of
> collective
> > > > > > > mentality are already evident, eventually (when I say
> eventually, I
> > > > > > > refer to a distant future) it will be on everyone's list of
> > > > > > > accomodations. Today's generation has less barbaric tendencies
> than
> > > > > > > say 1000 years ago.  Yet with the attainment of civility we
> still
> > > > > > > cater to war.  War whether we like to admit it or not,
> maintains
> > > the
> > > > > > > ratio of people versus earth's resources.  Man is the creator
> of
> > > his
> > > > > > > own demise.  Even Mother Nature herself steps in when man does
> not.
> > > > > > > Now would a collective mentality prevent tsunami's, eruptions
> of
> > > > > > > volcanoes, weather afflictions, earthquakes and disease?  Take
> the
> > > > > > > Black Plague for example; Europe's agricultural land and food
> > > supply
> > > > > > > did not accomodate to the demand of its residents.  Many were
> > > starving
> > > > > > > and hungry, the black plague moderated the ratio where the
> > > survivors
> > > > > > > were able to reestablish a resourceful community.  Time and
> time
> > > again
> > > > > > > history has proven the survival of the fittest element.
>  Philosophy
> > > > > > > and collective mentality theories have been developed as early
> as
> > > the
> > > > > > > Greeks.  It may be possible that one day citizens of the Earth
> will
> > > > > > > abide by a code of rules associated through a collective
> mentality.
> > > > > > > We can only hope.
> >
> > > > > > > On Apr 25, 11:44 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > What do I think?  I think it would not be a "simulation" of a
> > > perfect
> > > > > > > > world but a reality that all of
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>


-- 
(
 )
I_D Allan

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to