Thank You. peace & Love
On May 1, 9:31 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Ha! I would normally be concerned at the direction of this conversation, but > given the context, I say touche. > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:Tinker <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" > <[email protected]>Date:Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:50:34 -0700 > (PDT)Local:Thurs, Apr 30 2009 8:50 pmSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: The Wrong Way > > I guess you ain't smart enough to make a comment :-) > > peace & Love > > On Apr 30, 8:32 pm, Justintruth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Guess again. > > > On Apr 28, 7:22 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My take on the Dali Lama crying when he was asked if there was an easy > > > way to enlightenment sets the stage. > > > > Dali cried because he knows that the way to enlightenment is too > > > difficult, for enough of mankind to learn, and would never be able to > > > bring about the transcendence that Buddhism seeks as its flavor of > > > Unity. > > > > Why is it that all the great minds of our time and those of history > > > all converge on the fact that the power for solving all of the > > > problems of the world is within the mind of mankind, but none have > > > been able to affect the ways of mankind to bring about any significant > > > change? > > > The power connection in the mind has many different descriptions of it > > > and directions on how to access it. It can be simply a magnificent > > > light and it can be Jesus in all his glory. And it is exactly what it > > > is according to whoever is describing it. It is a real thing and > > > that’s the description that is available from previous information > > > that has been incorporated into the belief structure of the > > > individual. > > > It is energy. It is indescribable. But it is such a wonderful thing > > > that we have to describe it so we can claim it as ours. The method of > > > description is metaphor, using that which is familiar to us. > > > It is a resource for the individual to connect with the collective > > > intelligence. > > > When we connect with it we get a personal charge, it is a personal > > > thing, the opposite of a Unity thing. > > > We have gone to it (possibly only subconsciously), identified it and > > > made it our personal knowing and understanding justifier, establishing > > > our personal religion. And we exclude anything that is not in line > > > with our personal religion. > > > This is not the way to Unity. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
