2009/5/19 e_space <[email protected]> > > one very simple observation i have is that 'just because one cannot > prove something, in no way indicates that such does not exist'. i have > never heard an atheist state this. is this part of your appreciation > of the 'god' question?
Unfortunately, that simple observation is a logical fallacy -- Russell's teapot. I quite agree that an xtian being unable to provide proof of God doesn't necessarily mean that there is no God. On balance, however, this lack of proof leaves me unable to believe in God. I can't make that jump. Faith seems like a wretched thing to me, I'd rather remain uncertain than skip ahead to a conclusion that is so unsatisfying. Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
