Yes there is a lot to be said for self motivation. I have in the past performed volutary work, people do the same now, and charites do exist. As I say why would people do this, why for the betterment of mankind obviously.
Again on a serious note, I have admited that I have no idea how to initiate such a scheme, nor what problems the transitory period would bring, and yes it is highly idealogical of me, but I have not said it is not so, and yes despite all evidance to the contrary I still yearn for world peace. On 26 Aug, 16:51, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a lot to be said for self-motivation, I think. One of the > reasons centrally organised/non-profit works (better) in the social > area is that people working there can actually see needs and work on > them (nurses, teachers, police officers). In an ideal world, of course > - if their idealism and positive motivation isn't gradually crushed by > bureaucracies, idiotic rules, cost-cuts and being treated with > disrespect and contempt! And cowed into inaction by the exigencies of > the career ladder and an ever-more-prevalent attitude of cover-your- > ass ... > > Francis > > On 26 Aug., 17:13, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > These are exactly the points which tend to become problematic in state run > > manufacturing. Not all of them, mind you, but a number of them. Anyone drive > > a Volga lately? There are certain types of "Guaranteed labor/pay" scenarios > > which seem to work, and certain types which don't. As someone who fully > > supports socialized medicine and education, I'd really like to know what the > > magic formula is that guarantees QUALITY in such an endeavor. > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:19 AM, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Aug 26, 5:54 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Work is it, should it be a right? > > > > I notice that "quality" of work has not even been mentioned. As if the > > > talents, skills, and strengths are are all equal. So, would the > > > employer be getting whoever is next in line? (que?) > > > > I bet the employers will be thrilled with this idea. > > > > > I think another solution and a better one to my mind is based around > > > > the whole concept of money. Lets just get rid of it! It causes too > > > > many problems in the world. > > > > Lee, if you are going to remove a system, don't you think there is a > > > requirement to replace it with something else? Please describe how > > > the world would work without money. > > > I am interested how that would work. > > > > As far as "right to work" doesn't that translate to "I don't have to > > > work hard ever again" very soon? I mean, you are promised pay for > > > basically showing up. Can you be fired? (You just show up somewhere > > > else tomorrow, now you have "rights")- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
