Now not that I wish this to get bogged down in semantics, but I can't help but think that the word potential implies time.
So without time pre-existant before the start of the univeres there can't really be any potential, can there? Unless you are considering brane theory perhaps? On 14 Sep, 11:18, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 Sep, 11:13, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey Pat, > > > I'm having a bit of a problem with postulate 1. > > > 'Postulate 1) The universe, as we know it today and including > > all that has come before, must have been, at some point, potentially > > possible.' > > > At which point are we talking about, if time did not start before the > > universe did? > > Even if that point was 5 seconds ago, the universe, as it is today > was, at least, at THAT point, potentially possible. That potentiality > can, then, be extended as far back as possible. Remember that, prior > to time commencing, all things were potential, including time and its > passing. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
