Let me come at it in another way. So let's say I agree with you that a fact is a fact. So what? Unless you select one fact out of the billions of possible selectable facts it simply exists in a vacuum. No?
It is a fact that you feel passionately about your point of view. That is fine. But unless someone responds either pro or con or simply acknowledges the fact of your fact then for all practical purposes it exists in a vacuum. Or am I missing something. That unrecognized facts still have an existence apart from whether or not a human being recognizes their factualness I agree but so what? -----Original Message----- From: Slip Disc <[email protected]> To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Sep 20, 2009 1:24 pm Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Objectivism vs Altruism On Sep 20, 10:32?am, [email protected] wrote: > Of course Van Goghs painting is Van Goghs painting. That is a fact. And?<gw (Yes, of course it is, interpretation and meaning do not change it.) > > It is a fact that you and I are most likely going to die one day. Those are facts. <gw (Yes, physically as per belief. You say "most likely" but that adds ambiguity to the fact. Most likely is not a fact attribute, it's like kind of pregnant. > But without imputing meaning to those facts - the facts themselves are simply facts. <gw (Yes, exactly, facts, that's what I've said repeatedly. To impute meaning to a simple fact does not alter the fact because meaning can be assigned on an individual basis. As with VG's painting, for one the "meaning" might be Contribution to the Art World, but to another the meaning might be an Example of a gross abomination, anathema) (You assigned meaning to the "Object" on your office table as being beautiful, blue, ashtray, however to a minimalist the object would be rendered meaningless and viewed as clutter. Fact remains; you have a "Object" on your office table.) > > In a way who cares? <gw (It's not a matter of caring, you should know caring is an emotion, are we attaching emotion to facts now? Beautiful blue ashtray?) > > Unless a person attributes meaning to any facts - the facts themselves are by definition meaningless and simly exist. <gw (It is not essential for a fact to have meaning, it can still be a fact. It is meaningless to me that there are 63 moons around planet Jupiter but it is still a fact) > > If you are impressed with the mere fact of existing objects so be it.<gw (Impressed? I simply acknowledge that facts do exist, some may have meaning and be pertinent to other issues and some may just be a fact without meaning. Point still remains intact, individual perceptions of fact do not alter the fact which you have yet failed to demonstrate otherwise.) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
