you should read (aging a lifelong trek to  nirvana)

On Oct 23, 1:28 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> The work of The Jesus Seminar, while some scholars might quibble over
> certain of their methods and results, give a basic method of
> delineating aspects of the Jesus event which seem to have a broad
> basis of acceptance with respect to some kind of authenticity:
>
>  According to the Jesus Seminar:
> Jesus of Nazareth was born during the reign of Herod the Great.
> His mother's name was Mary, and he had a human father whose name may
> not have been Joseph.
> Jesus was born in Nazareth, not in Bethlehem.
> Jesus was an itinerant sage who shared meals with social outcasts.
> Jesus practiced healing without the use of ancient medicine or magic,
> relieving afflictions we now consider psychosomatic.
> He did not walk on water, feed the multitude with loaves and fishes,
> change water into wine or raise Lazarus from the dead.
> Jesus was arrested in Jerusalem and crucified by the Romans.
> He was executed as a public nuisance, not for claiming to be the Son
> of God.
> The empty tomb is a fiction – Jesus was not raised bodily from the
> dead.
> Belief in the resurrection is based on the visionary experiences of
> Paul, Peter and Mary Magdalene.
>
> (Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Seminar)
>
> See 
> also:http://www.westarinstitute.org/http://virtualreligion.net/forum/http://www.veritas-ucsb.org//library/pearson/seminar/home.html
>
> Francis
>
> On 23 Okt., 21:41, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > The fact that Jesus was part of the Essenes suggests that he was aware of 
> > esoteric occult consciousness.
>
> > To me this is a much more tenable explanation of his mixed clear and opaque 
> > style.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: frantheman <[email protected]>
> > To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2009 3:04 pm
> > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: A new (old) book
>
> > ttempts to get to the original Jesus have been manifold, and the area
> > s one of difficult scholarship, particularly given the fact that
> > extual criticism is a central theme in many philosophical debates
> > ith regard to structuralism and deconstruction. The following two
> > ikipedia links can serve only as a beginning for those who really
> > ant to get into this very complex 
> > subject:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Quest_for_the_Historical_Jesus
> > ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus#Quest_for_the_historical_Jesus
> > Francis
> > On 23 Okt., 20:49, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> >  Allan, while not exactly what you say you are looking for, Thomas
> >  Jefferson published an interesting version of the New Testament
> >  removing sections "... containing supernatural aspects as well as
> >  perceived misinterpretations he believed had been added by the Four
> >  Evangelists."
>
> >  One can read more about it here:
>
> >  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible
>
> >  On Oct 23, 10:57 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >  > I have often wondered what the new  testament of  the bible would be 
> > like if
> >  > you removed the parts that are in reality are made up short stories used 
> > to
> >  > sell a bill of goods. An example(s) being the nativity stories, the
> >  > resurrection (misunderstood,)   the writings of Saul Of Tarsus  the book 
> > of
> >  > revelations. to name a few
>
> >  > I wonder if a book (it would probably be very short) getting rid of the
> >  > exact interpretation but rather trying to expressed express the ideas 
> > that
> >  > Jesus the man best wanted to express.  I look at our group and the 
> > atheists
> >  > and agnostics have a very valuable role in working out that validity of 
> > what
> >  > is being said.  There is a definite need to counter balance my own 
> > beliefs
> >  > and those of other fanatics.
>
> >  > To tell the truth this would be a total dream for me. There is an event
> >  > astronomically that can be dated like a total solar eclipse over 
> > Jerusalem
> >  > in 33 CE. I do know that there are religious fanatics in the Philippines
> >  > that are crucified (literally) and they regularly survive it. I think 
> > these
> >  > things need to be taken into account, from what I understand it actually
> >  > takes several days to die that way.
>
> >  > Here I have to admit I am jealous of the sheer enlightenment of spiritual
> >  > knowledge Francis and other members of this group possess. I am hoping 
> > they
> >  > will take to this idea.
> >  > Allan
>
> >  > (
> >  >  )
> >  > I_D Allan
> > -~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> > ou received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Minds Eye"" group.
> > o post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > o unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > or more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
> > ~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to