Not quite sure what you are getting at here Neil?  You belive such a
belife is a choice perhaps?

Can you choose to belive the opposite I wonder?

On 19 Jan, 02:24, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've always wondered about converts Lee, in the 'scientist dissecting
> their heads' kinda way.  The worst tend to be ultra-rightists who used
> to be lefties, but the fervour of all converts seems much the same
> (you are an excellent exception, but before taking praise on board,
> remember that only makes you are more interesting dissection
> specimen).  Sue and I will never vote Labour again, but fear not - we
> look so bad in lederhosen we're going for the Liberals or Greens.  I'd
> prefer to vote for a party like those German guys who shout
> 'Applejuice' at Nazis.  My rather wandering point is that people
> change their world-views pretty totally sometimes, both into and out
> of religion, as often into agnosticism as between faiths of
> denominations.  It's also pretty clear now that we do have a godspot
> in the brain and this varies in impact between us.  Many very
> brilliant people are also subject to delusions that seem to come from
> the same place (on their reports).
> The usual stuff about believing in god seems forced on most people by
> 'socially approved epistemic authority'.  They use all kinds of
> tricks, a bit like the shits trying to bully my grandson into giving
> up his Muslim friends at the moment.  I choose not to believe in any
> god that any group believes in as they are all tarnished one way or
> another, but I suspect many of us are more concerned with something
> very different than god in the sense 'he' is normally dealt out to us.
>
> Deep philosophy can't really find the ground on which there is a
> science versus religion argument that is remotely rational - one does
> not equate out the other unless one simply follows dogma rather than
> 'truth'.  Dawkins v the Archbishop of Canterbury is really promoted by
> the literary equivalents of Frank Warren.  One can be spiritual
> without god, and a combination of evolution and modern work on self-
> organisation suggests we are not on a wholly determined path.  One can
> read Kant, but then discover Prichard saying the opposite: ‘Knowledge
> is sui generis and therefore a ‘theory’ of knowledge is impossible.
> Knowledge is knowledge, and any attempt to state it is terms of
> something else must end in describing something which is not
> knowledge’.  More modern again, we find that we can only do our best
> with what is undecidable - god questions surely being that.
> It seems fit for me to broadly reject belief in god and that this view
> can be particular to me as what might make you be a seeker Lee (and so
> on).  Only irrationality would make this difference important.  What
> one swallows in faith though is often much more than the innocence of
> truth-seeking.
>
> On 18 Jan, 23:53, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "do we really choose to have faith in God's existence", you wonder.
> > You suspect not.
>
> > One could choose to believe God exists, just as one could choose to
> > believe the earth orbits the sun. Billions have done both. Speaking
> > for myself, I do not know the earth orbits the sun, because I have not
> > taken the time to conduct the necessary experiments. I have no doubt
> > it does because I trust that the scientists have done their work well.
> > But for myself it is not properly called "knowledge" that the earth
> > moves. Rather, I have chosen to trust the scientists on this point.
>
> > Now one could do the same thing with God: believe God is, on the trust
> > in other credible people. And that is good enough for children. But it
> > is really only the faith of parents and teachers alive in the
> > children.
>
> > But eventually one grows up, works through the proofs of God, and that
> > knowledge is perfected. That God exists exists is /not/ an article of
> > faith for those who can follow the proofs, just as "the earth orbits
> > the sun" is /not/ an article of faith for those who have conducted the
> > relevant experiments. Faced with a truth that can be known by reason
> > or faith, a person has an option to convert it from an article of
> > faith to a conclusion of reason.
>
> > Even so, there is a world of difference between "I believe X" and "I
> > believe in X". The man for whom God's existence is not an article of
> > faith but a conclusion of reason, has only begun. He knows God is
> > (because he followed the proofs), and he knows it with the certainty
> > he knows two is a prime number, and with far greater certainty than
> > the scientist knows earth orbits the sun (which is, after all, an
> > empirical conclusion, and subject to correction by future facts). He
> > knows God is. But does he believe in God?
>
> > On Jan 18, 9:32 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > So I have been away for a week(damn me am the only IT bod in the world
> > > without Internet access at home,this is NOT the question) and when I
> > > come back i see all sorts of rows and arguments and I guess what can
> > > only be described as 'bad bood'
>
> > > Those of you who know me well enough by now know that one of my things
> > > is the concept of 'free will' and it is something along these lines
> > > that I want to ask you about.
>
> > > Choice of belifes.  I was asked elswhere a while back on some Sikh
> > > forum or other why I choose to belive that the entity we know as God
> > > exists.  After thinking about it for a while I realised that I
> > > couldn't really answer this question in any way other then:
>
> > > 'Good question Agnostic Ji.
>
> > > Do we really choose to have faith in God's existance though? Can we
> > > literaly choose what we wish to belive or not?
> > > Lets try it, please try to choose to belive that God exists and let us
> > > know what happens.
> > > I suspect that I can no more choose not to belive in God than I have
> > > chossen the opposite.'
>
> > > Am I right?  Rather like one's sexual preferance, is it true that one
> > > can choose to belive in God or not?
>
> > > Ian I'm look at you my friend.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to