On Jan 29, 6:42 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ultimatly though, we will all belive as we will, for good or for ill, > > logic, empricalism, faith, can you really tell me which methoed of > > though is best? Can you then show me the evidance why you belive > > this? Can you show me certian objective evidance? > > Which method of thought is best? Oh, my friend, I couldn't be so arrogant. I > can only affirm and attest to which method of thought I have found best for > me, and which I use to test all other information presented to me. There is > no way at all for me to engage in an argument about which "godswank" is > better or truer, because there is no evidence for any of it. In a religious > universe, worshippers of Kali could be on the most spiritually valid > path...there's just no way to tell when we're discussing shadowy nether > realms and palaces of light in the sky. Chris, we don't know enough about God to say "there's just no way to tell". If people believed that about the physical world, science would have never gotten going. If we are to rise to God by use of intellect, the first step is to abandon the dogma of agnosticism.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
