> A notable difference between scientific thought and religious thought is > that scientific thought does not in any way claim to be complete; it is ever > evolving and growing as the volume of total observations grows. Religion, on > the other hand, does claim completeness, and resists (by default) changes to > the ideology.
Is this also true though Chris? If it where true might you not expect any new religioins to pop up? Yet my own is a mere 600 odd years old, and that ba'hai malarky is also quite young. Perhaps then you mean certian religions? Yeah I have offten spoke on my thought about the likelyhood of the Christian faith ultimatly failing to survive, and perhaps Islam. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
