i always felt you did social anthropology or something...not doubting you scientific side
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't sell yourself short, I managed arts (PHIL) and sciences (EE/IE/CS) > during my college excursion. That's like saying you cannot be intelligent > and athletic, they seem to work well together (especially for the brain). > > > On 6/3/2010 1:11 AM, pol.science kid wrote: > > wow..this makes me regret leaving science for humanities.. you cant have > everything can you > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Pat <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On 1 June, 11:03, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > really! awesome.. i totally had no idea of that..luno solar actitvity >> > influencing us so..'may' is a pretty strong word in itself though.. >> > >> >> Well, it's difficult to prove. Although there's no doubt that gravity >> has far-reaching effects. Technically, it reaches across the universe >> and every particle of matter that HAS mass has some gravitational >> effects on every other particle. Also note that, while photons have >> no 'rest mass', one NEVER sees a photon at rest. Rather, they move at >> near the speed of light (I say 'near' in order to account for some >> slowing that occurs as they move through whatever medium they are >> moving through, whether that be our atmosphere or the lens of a >> telescope and ultimately the cornea and lens of our eye). So, while I >> expect you are familiar with E=MC^2 as the relationship between energy >> and mass, there is another equation that must also come into play with >> respect to photons and that is E=Fh where E is energy, F is the >> frequency of the photon and 'h' is the Planck Constant. So, by using >> these two equations together, one can see that if you take the >> frequency of a photon, F, and multiply it by the Planck Constant, you >> yield the 'energy' of that photon. Divide that by C^2, the speed of >> light in a vacuum, and you have calculated the 'mass' of the photon. >> It's my belief that the supposed 'dark matter' is nothing more than >> the gravitational trails of the countless photons moving across space- >> time. The more space-time that one looks through, the more trails of >> photon have crossed that path and, thus, the more 'dark matter' you >> see. Note, you only see the photons that are heading towards your >> eyes, those that cross across that path are NOT seen and it is THESE >> that I believe form the basis of the elusive dark matter that accounts >> for a huge amount of energy that simply passes across our line of >> sight. Because we don't 'see' these photons (because they aren't >> headed in our direction), they only show up by virtue of their >> gravitational effects, thus they 'appear' as dark matter. >> >> >> > On 6/1/10, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On 30 May, 08:45, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > I was wondering if astrology is for real..i mean is there a fragment >> > > > of truth in it.. even though it seems completely irrational...does >> the >> > > > fact that it has been there for ages give it legitimacy..or is it >> pure >> > > > fluff feeding off people uncertainties about life... >> > >> > > It could well be an aspect of the general holography of the universe. >> > > That is, there are aspects ofthe universe which reflect the entirety, >> > > if one is open to looking for these reflections and know how to >> > > interpret them. One thing IS for sure, gravity's effect is real and >> > > carries across space-time from one end to the other. We know that the >> > > luno-solar gravity accounts for the tides and the word 'lunacy' >> > > implies that those tidal effects may (strictly MAY!!) also affect our >> > > cerebro-spinal fluid in a subtle way.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> > > >
