oh no.. you only felt like a social anthropologist because of your take on certain things... guess youre a natural there..:-)
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > If you mean professionally I do computer technology and some accounting by > day, mainly I do well with systems not memorization. Though given the > system, my memory surprises me sometimes. I have considered working in the > arts or teaching, not seriously though. Not too disappointed I hope. :) > > > On 6/5/2010 9:59 AM, pol.science kid wrote: > > i always felt you did social anthropology or something...not doubting you > scientific side > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Don't sell yourself short, I managed arts (PHIL) and sciences (EE/IE/CS) >> during my college excursion. That's like saying you cannot be intelligent >> and athletic, they seem to work well together (especially for the brain). >> >> >> On 6/3/2010 1:11 AM, pol.science kid wrote: >> >> wow..this makes me regret leaving science for humanities.. you cant have >> everything can you >> >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Pat <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 1 June, 11:03, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > really! awesome.. i totally had no idea of that..luno solar actitvity >>> > influencing us so..'may' is a pretty strong word in itself though.. >>> > >>> >>> Well, it's difficult to prove. Although there's no doubt that gravity >>> has far-reaching effects. Technically, it reaches across the universe >>> and every particle of matter that HAS mass has some gravitational >>> effects on every other particle. Also note that, while photons have >>> no 'rest mass', one NEVER sees a photon at rest. Rather, they move at >>> near the speed of light (I say 'near' in order to account for some >>> slowing that occurs as they move through whatever medium they are >>> moving through, whether that be our atmosphere or the lens of a >>> telescope and ultimately the cornea and lens of our eye). So, while I >>> expect you are familiar with E=MC^2 as the relationship between energy >>> and mass, there is another equation that must also come into play with >>> respect to photons and that is E=Fh where E is energy, F is the >>> frequency of the photon and 'h' is the Planck Constant. So, by using >>> these two equations together, one can see that if you take the >>> frequency of a photon, F, and multiply it by the Planck Constant, you >>> yield the 'energy' of that photon. Divide that by C^2, the speed of >>> light in a vacuum, and you have calculated the 'mass' of the photon. >>> It's my belief that the supposed 'dark matter' is nothing more than >>> the gravitational trails of the countless photons moving across space- >>> time. The more space-time that one looks through, the more trails of >>> photon have crossed that path and, thus, the more 'dark matter' you >>> see. Note, you only see the photons that are heading towards your >>> eyes, those that cross across that path are NOT seen and it is THESE >>> that I believe form the basis of the elusive dark matter that accounts >>> for a huge amount of energy that simply passes across our line of >>> sight. Because we don't 'see' these photons (because they aren't >>> headed in our direction), they only show up by virtue of their >>> gravitational effects, thus they 'appear' as dark matter. >>> >>> >>> > On 6/1/10, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On 30 May, 08:45, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > I was wondering if astrology is for real..i mean is there a >>> fragment >>> > > > of truth in it.. even though it seems completely irrational...does >>> the >>> > > > fact that it has been there for ages give it legitimacy..or is it >>> pure >>> > > > fluff feeding off people uncertainties about life... >>> > >>> > > It could well be an aspect of the general holography of the universe. >>> > > That is, there are aspects ofthe universe which reflect the entirety, >>> > > if one is open to looking for these reflections and know how to >>> > > interpret them. One thing IS for sure, gravity's effect is real and >>> > > carries across space-time from one end to the other. We know that >>> the >>> > > luno-solar gravity accounts for the tides and the word 'lunacy' >>> > > implies that those tidal effects may (strictly MAY!!) also affect our >>> > > cerebro-spinal fluid in a subtle way.- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > - Show quoted text - >>> >> >> >> > > -- \--/ Peace
