If you mean professionally I do computer technology and some accounting by day, mainly I do well with systems not memorization. Though given the system, my memory surprises me sometimes. I have considered working in the arts or teaching, not seriously though. Not too disappointed I hope. :)

On 6/5/2010 9:59 AM, pol.science kid wrote:
i always felt you did social anthropology or something...not doubting you scientific side

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ash <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Don't sell yourself short, I managed arts (PHIL) and sciences
    (EE/IE/CS) during my college excursion. That's like saying you
    cannot be intelligent and athletic, they seem to work well
    together (especially for the brain).


    On 6/3/2010 1:11 AM, pol.science kid wrote:
    wow..this makes me regret leaving science for humanities.. you
    cant have everything can you

    On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Pat
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



        On 1 June, 11:03, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        > really! awesome.. i totally had no idea of that..luno solar
        actitvity
        > influencing us so..'may' is a pretty strong word in itself
        though..
        >

        Well, it's difficult to prove.  Although there's no doubt
        that gravity
        has far-reaching effects.  Technically, it reaches across the
        universe
        and every particle of matter that HAS mass has some gravitational
        effects on every other particle.  Also note that, while
        photons have
        no 'rest mass', one NEVER sees a photon at rest.  Rather,
        they move at
        near the speed of light (I say 'near' in order to account for
        some
        slowing that occurs as they move through whatever medium they are
        moving through, whether that be our atmosphere or the lens of a
        telescope and ultimately the cornea and lens of our eye).
         So, while I
        expect you are familiar with E=MC^2 as the relationship
        between energy
        and mass, there is another equation that must also come into
        play with
        respect to photons and that is E=Fh where E is energy, F is the
        frequency of the photon and 'h' is the Planck Constant.  So,
        by using
        these two equations together, one can see that if you take the
        frequency of a photon, F, and multiply it by the Planck
        Constant, you
        yield the 'energy' of that photon.  Divide that by C^2, the
        speed of
        light in a vacuum, and you have calculated the 'mass' of the
        photon.
        It's my belief that the supposed 'dark matter' is nothing
        more than
        the gravitational trails of the countless photons moving
        across space-
        time.  The more space-time that one looks through, the more
        trails of
        photon have crossed that path and, thus, the more 'dark
        matter' you
        see.  Note, you only see the photons that are heading towards
        your
        eyes, those that cross across that path are NOT seen and it
        is THESE
        that I believe form the basis of the elusive dark matter that
        accounts
        for a huge amount of energy that simply passes across our line of
        sight.  Because we don't 'see' these photons (because they aren't
        headed in our direction), they only show up by virtue of their
        gravitational effects, thus they 'appear' as dark matter.


        > On 6/1/10, Pat <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > > On 30 May, 08:45, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        > > > I was wondering if astrology is for real..i mean is
        there a fragment
        > > > of truth in it.. even though it seems completely
        irrational...does the
        > > > fact that it has been there for ages give it
        legitimacy..or is it pure
        > > > fluff feeding off people uncertainties about life...
        >
        > > It could well be an aspect of the general holography of
        the universe.
        > > That is, there are aspects ofthe universe which reflect
        the entirety,
        > > if one is open to looking for these reflections and know
        how to
        > > interpret them.  One thing IS for sure, gravity's effect
        is real and
        > > carries across space-time from one end to the other.  We
        know that the
        > > luno-solar gravity accounts for the tides and the word
        'lunacy'
        > > implies that those tidal effects may (strictly MAY!!)
        also affect our
        > > cerebro-spinal fluid in a subtle way.- Hide quoted text -
        >
        > - Show quoted text -





Reply via email to