Hey, Slip. It's a melding of the two I'm talking about. There is no valid reason a wealthy and robust economy can't take care of it's members, even unto the least of them. However, there are number of invalid reasons: greed, selfishness, ego, fear, etc. etc. etc.
On Jun 11, 2:56 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > Double posting Gruff? Good to see you emerging from a long hiatus, > leave it to capitalistic dialogue to lure you in. Either that or the > desert heat is pointing to a better indoor environment and more time > on the computer. > > As usual I wish I could wholeheartedly agree with you but regardless > of how much better poverty seems in the current light it doesn't > change the fact that much of capitalism is causal to poverty. I could > agree with the behavioral aspect to which you point to as being a huge > flaw but not as it being the only one. There is much to be done to > improve the system but then again we could also tweak socialism to be > a better system and perhaps a melding of the two might bring about a > whole new perspective on social governance. > >
