... "On Jun 12, 7:36 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:" ...
> We may as well respect each other's differing view of history since > it's in your "list"- don't you agree? I agree that everyone has a right to an opinion and view of history, but some opinions and views are more correct than others, notwithstanding that the history I was talking about is recent history for which some very real hard evidence exists. It does not rest wholly on faulty and biased memory. > At any rate, I am not an economist so when you start > rattling off all those numbers and percentages, I grow dizzy. Then best sit down and rest your mind a bit rather than attempting a critical analysis, don't you think? I'm not an economist either, but much of what I'm talking about is common sense and the information is easily available to all. > But...did you think that a rising > tide could also drown us all? No, to be honest, I didn't think of that because it's only true for those sufficiently insufficient to get into a boat or move to higher ground. This is also why we are also caretakers ... to watch over those unable to care for themselves. > Plus I have several thoughts from a > female point of view regarding the liberation of women, no-fault, > voting, culture, etc. but am sure they will "keep". :-) Aye, I'm sure they will. You and I have disagreed before as to the status and ability of women in the modern day world and I can't see that anything has changed. Women can and do stand shoulder to shoulder and back to back with men in our 'enlightened' world and while they still get paid less for it, parity is in process. Enjoy your coasting.
