You may be on to something here, archytas. There is some evidence that
we are "editors" of real time; we can never actually "live" a moment;
when you add photon travel time to neural processing time, to
referential mapping, to consciousness, you get a huge great big gap in
human "agency".


On Jun 9, 5:07 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I often find myself thinking about trance states and how we could spot
> them. The classic for me is that we are merely vehicles for our
> machine-like genes something I find 'true' and highly unlikely until I
> switch the tv on.  I believe both that we are tranced and that
> ejukation is part of it.  Various herd and pack animals are quite
> clearly tranced in respect of leadership by chemical-biological
> means.  We have some idea of the operation in humans.  The networks of
> our held world-views are highly self-deceptive and not really amenable
> to 'facts'.  When we look scientifically, we find 'cactus structures'
> of control - my sense is that 'spin' knows something of this, but we
> fear something that is evolving that would replace the world view
> levels we have that would not rely on trance.
>
> On Jun 9, 4:32 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You're not being manipulated. You're going after something you really
> > want. I think that's different.
>
> > On Jun 8, 9:11 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure I can agree with the idea that education makes us less
> > > susceptible to manipulation. In some cases it may even make us more
> > > susceptible. Using myself as an example, I'm fairly well educated with 
> > > about
> > > 5 years of college but if you dangle the latest high performance graphics
> > > card or multi-core processor in front of me you'll have me drooling like a
> > > lobotomy patient in no time.
>
> > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:30 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > In regards to manipulation by culture/ads and the advantage of
> > > > education and it continuation in adult life, I would say it allows us
> > > > to see through the obvious exaggeration, lack of logic and attempt to
> > > > create an artificial want/need/desire. In fact, the exercise is pretty
> > > > humorous but I do admit to having a few shopaholic moments in my own
> > > > life so I have also been gullible.
>
> > > > On Jun 7, 10:15 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hummm... For some reason I had the impression you were male.
>
> > > > > At any rate, I don't think education or economic status has much to do
> > > > with
> > > > > our susceptibility. We can all be manipulated into believing things 
> > > > > that
> > > > > aren't necessarily true. Take the social prerogative to stay one up on
> > > > the
> > > > > next door neighbors. Millions are spent on commercial campaigns that 
> > > > > try
> > > > and
> > > > > convince us that we should have a bigger TV, newer car, or better
> > > > > furniture.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to