A realist. :-)

On Jun 10, 2:54 pm, paradox <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, what are your choices, rigsy03? Go on, share...:)
>
> On Jun 10, 2:59 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > True. I sure wish I'd figure out what I want to be when I grow up! :-)
>
> > On Jun 9, 11:45 am, paradox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > You may be on to something here, archytas. There is some evidence that
> > > we are "editors" of real time; we can never actually "live" a moment;
> > > when you add photon travel time to neural processing time, to
> > > referential mapping, to consciousness, you get a huge great big gap in
> > > human "agency".
>
> > > On Jun 9, 5:07 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I often find myself thinking about trance states and how we could spot
> > > > them. The classic for me is that we are merely vehicles for our
> > > > machine-like genes something I find 'true' and highly unlikely until I
> > > > switch the tv on.  I believe both that we are tranced and that
> > > > ejukation is part of it.  Various herd and pack animals are quite
> > > > clearly tranced in respect of leadership by chemical-biological
> > > > means.  We have some idea of the operation in humans.  The networks of
> > > > our held world-views are highly self-deceptive and not really amenable
> > > > to 'facts'.  When we look scientifically, we find 'cactus structures'
> > > > of control - my sense is that 'spin' knows something of this, but we
> > > > fear something that is evolving that would replace the world view
> > > > levels we have that would not rely on trance.
>
> > > > On Jun 9, 4:32 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > You're not being manipulated. You're going after something you really
> > > > > want. I think that's different.
>
> > > > > On Jun 8, 9:11 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > I'm not sure I can agree with the idea that education makes us less
> > > > > > susceptible to manipulation. In some cases it may even make us more
> > > > > > susceptible. Using myself as an example, I'm fairly well educated 
> > > > > > with about
> > > > > > 5 years of college but if you dangle the latest high performance 
> > > > > > graphics
> > > > > > card or multi-core processor in front of me you'll have me drooling 
> > > > > > like a
> > > > > > lobotomy patient in no time.
>
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:30 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > In regards to manipulation by culture/ads and the advantage of
> > > > > > > education and it continuation in adult life, I would say it 
> > > > > > > allows us
> > > > > > > to see through the obvious exaggeration, lack of logic and 
> > > > > > > attempt to
> > > > > > > create an artificial want/need/desire. In fact, the exercise is 
> > > > > > > pretty
> > > > > > > humorous but I do admit to having a few shopaholic moments in my 
> > > > > > > own
> > > > > > > life so I have also been gullible.
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 7, 10:15 pm, Chuck Bowling 
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hummm... For some reason I had the impression you were male.
>
> > > > > > > > At any rate, I don't think education or economic status has 
> > > > > > > > much to do
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > our susceptibility. We can all be manipulated into believing 
> > > > > > > > things that
> > > > > > > > aren't necessarily true. Take the social prerogative to stay 
> > > > > > > > one up on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > next door neighbors. Millions are spent on commercial campaigns 
> > > > > > > > that try
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > convince us that we should have a bigger TV, newer car, or 
> > > > > > > > better
> > > > > > > > furniture.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to