So Lee, you discount the reports of those who share their experiences
of reincarnation?

On Aug 12, 2:07 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Jo,
>
> Death remains a mystery to us because as yet nobody has ever returned
> after death to let us know what it is all about, and I must assume as
> nobody has yet done so in the millenia of human life then it is likely
> that nobody will ever do so.
>
> As to acting out side of the norm, well what is normal and what is out
> side of normal?  I think that what ever an individual, or a group
> does, says or thinks must be normal.  I mean within the normal
> parameters of whatever it means to be human.  Simply put if a human
> does, says or thinks, as it is a human doing it, it must be normal
> human behaviour.
>
> On Aug 11, 4:29 pm, Jo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Okay please excuse me if this has already been discussed before. Often
> > times I think myself into a corner and these questions frustrate me to
> > no end. No one knows what happens after death. Some believe that death
> > is the end. I would like to know why it has to be such a big secret!
>
> > We’re obviously a part of some cycle. I find it hard to believe that
> > we cease to exist after death. I think death is merely a change. What
> > if our survival instinct is directly linked to learning what occurs
> > after death or before life? Before we have a chance reason things out
> > our instinct to survive forces us to assimilate.
>
> > We’re equipped with emotions which are required for developing
> > socially. We see this in babies who develop their social skills by
> > studying the faces of those around them. So obviously we need to
> > interact with each other. What if discovering the meaning of life or
> > what occurs after death is something that we’ll discover collectively?
> > What happens when a mass of people die at once like in war or a
> > natural disaster?
>
> > And about this idea of God; What if we needed to believe that we were
> > being watched in order to implement laws to govern ourselves? Do we
> > not (for the most part) act in accordance whenever we think we’re
> > being watched?
>
> > We seem to have a fascination for risk takers, good and bad. Why is
> > that? Does acting outside of the norm help us discover more about
> > these mysteries? Why do they have to be mysteries in the first place?!
>
> > On Aug 11, 6:38 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Long deliberations , introspection , observation and study are the
> > > precursors of the training I speak of. You have read Patanjali yoga ,
> > > I ask you to widen your browsing and deliberate and introspect in
> > > solitude , if possible. I cannot give you any guarantee as you
> > > yourself cannot to those who are following the Raja yoga system of
> > > Patanjali with a sureshot experience of the absolute. Of course you
> > > can give an assurance in a future life which I cannot as I don't
> > > believe in an after-life.On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Vam 
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > "...  it takes a trained understanding to know the truth."
>
> > > > RP, tell us more specifically about
>
> > > > (1) training you speak of,
> > > > (2) the understanding that would be accrue with the training, and
> > > > (3) the truth we will know upon the understanding.
>
> > > > Will you ?
>
> > > > On Aug 11, 2:45 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> I can open my fingers or close them , i.e. free will is obvious. Most
> > > >> people can see only the obvious , it takes a trained understanding to
> > > >> know the truth.
>
> > > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:39 AM, allan deheretic 
> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Sorry RP Vam has both the wisdom and authority to make such a 
> > > >> > statement.
> > > >> > Allan
>
> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:20 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> Vehement language , Vam , I don't think you have the authority to 
> > > >> >> use
> > > >> >> such words against others. Maybe , you are a great success but what
> > > >> >> makes you think that all others having a determinist view are spent
> > > >> >> people ?
>
> > > >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Vam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> >> > "... if we can reflect upon ourselves- as
> > > >> >> > an object- we have created distance from those 
> > > >> >> > markers-determiners-
> > > >> >> > and can choose in an independent manner- thoughts, actions."
>
> > > >> >> > This is the kind of experiential understanding and empowerment I 
> > > >> >> > was
> > > >> >> > speaking of !
>
> > > >> >> > Most people do not discover this. And if they do, they do not 
> > > >> >> > practice
> > > >> >> > it enough to lead to empowerment. It is because of this that they
> > > >> >> > continue to look upon themselves as programmed robots and 
> > > >> >> > automatons,
> > > >> >> > and continue to doubt the clear measure of power they have to 
> > > >> >> > choose
> > > >> >> > their beliefs, thoughts, words and action. Then they project it 
> > > >> >> > over
> > > >> >> > entire humanity, as us all being some creation of some obscure god
> > > >> >> > playing fiddle. Fking shit ! Such regressives should be barred 
> > > >> >> > from
> > > >> >> > public activity, and sent to a correction facility instead.
>
> > > >> >> > On Aug 10, 5:53 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> Well, Hocking made some sense to me about Free Will- though I 
> > > >> >> >> could
> > > >> >> >> read it again. It goes like this- if we can reflect upon 
> > > >> >> >> ourselves- as
> > > >> >> >> an object- we have created distance from those 
> > > >> >> >> markers-determiners-
> > > >> >> >> and can choose in an independent manner- thoughts, actions. 
> > > >> >> >> Reflection
> > > >> >> >> is an endless process rather than fixed. But- "freedom is a 
> > > >> >> >> matter of
> > > >> >> >> degree".
>
> > > >> >> >> On Aug 10, 5:26 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > Yes it does not mean that that they do not exist, but it does 
> > > >> >> >> > mean
> > > >> >> >> > that this stance is as aI say a best guess, or perhaps we 
> > > >> >> >> > shall call
> > > >> >> >> > it an inferance.
>
> > > >> >> >> > Yes again I belive that these markers may well be part of the
> > > >> >> >> > desicion, yet you can still choose to act contrary to any of 
> > > >> >> >> > these
> > > >> >> >> > markers.
>
> > > >> >> >> > If you are non violent you act in a violent mannor, if you are
> > > >> >> >> > violent
> > > >> >> >> > you can choose to not use violence.  And what is a marker, is 
> > > >> >> >> > it a
> > > >> >> >> > force or as the word suggests a marker?
>
> > > >> >> >> > On Aug 9, 10:23 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > > We can point to many causes- our genes, mental and physical 
> > > >> >> >> > > health
> > > >> >> >> > > of
> > > >> >> >> > > mother before, during and after pregnancy, early bonding and
> > > >> >> >> > > childhood
> > > >> >> >> > > development, placement in family, economic and social 
> > > >> >> >> > > influences,
> > > >> >> >> > > etc.
> > > >> >> >> > > Even the country of birth and historical period matter. 
> > > >> >> >> > > Reason
> > > >> >> >> > > doesn't
> > > >> >> >> > > kick in until around age seven and many early influences are
> > > >> >> >> > > forgotten, misinterpreted or markers for life. The fact that 
> > > >> >> >> > > one
> > > >> >> >> > > cannot readily trace back to initial influences and causes 
> > > >> >> >> > > does not
> > > >> >> >> > > mean that they don't exist. At the moment of choice, I 
> > > >> >> >> > > believe
> > > >> >> >> > > these
> > > >> >> >> > > markers are part of the decision- even if the decision is to 
> > > >> >> >> > > reject
> > > >> >> >> > > the influences and do the exact opposite of the past- like a 
> > > >> >> >> > > child
> > > >> >> >> > > who
> > > >> >> >> > > swears he will be different than the parent but winds up 
> > > >> >> >> > > being
> > > >> >> >> > > similar
> > > >> >> >> > > or tries to out-do the parent and fails.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > On Aug 9, 8:38 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> 
> > > >> >> >> > > wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > Heh heh Rigsy.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > Nope I think the deterministic stance is kinda like a best 
> > > >> >> >> > > > guess.
> > > >> >> >> > > > I mean for us to be sure that our lives are determined we 
> > > >> >> >> > > > need to
> > > >> >> >> > > > coreleate all causes.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > Besides, I do not belive that cause and effect bars our 
> > > >> >> >> > > > freedom
> > > >> >> >> > > > of
> > > >> >> >> > > > choice.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > On Aug 9, 12:41 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > One's will is shaped by numerous influences and 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > experiences
> > > >> >> >> > > > > therefore
> > > >> >> >> > > > > it is determined. Notes from the Underground-D does not
> > > >> >> >> > > > > convince me
> > > >> >> >> > > > > otherwise. I'll see if Hocking can offer something.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > You really have to be a detective of self and follow 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > choice
> > > >> >> >> > > > > back to
> > > >> >> >> > > > > its root cause. Maybe you are too young or busy! :-)
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > On Aug 8, 6:12 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > Ahh then I see.  I do not belive that choice and free 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > will
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > are
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > seperate things at all.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > Let us look at the words.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > Free will.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > The ability to chose in acordance with your will.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > On Aug 8, 11:47 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > Haven't you noticed trying to get from A to B and 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > winding
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > up at C? I
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > have. So far I have been going over some stuff by
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > Sophocles.
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > Epictetus, Zola, Marx&Engels, Huxley and Skinner
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > (Determinists) but
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > have to read Dostoyevsky and Hocking (Free Will). I 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > think
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > there is a
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > difference between choice and free will. I make 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > choices all
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > the time
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > but am not sure my will is really free.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > On Aug 8, 5:07 am, Lee Douglas 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > Ohh I disagree with this entirley Rigsy.
>
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > At the time the Minds says take action B, then we 
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > have
> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > made a
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Reply via email to