Heheh I was  gonna crack a funny about they and belife and drugs, but meh I 
just can't be bothered.   
 
But is there a they who seek to control via these or any other methods?  
Naaaa.
 

On Monday, 19 November 2012 09:18:25 UTC, andrew vecsey wrote:

> With drugs and mass media they control our desires and with drugs and 
> schools they control our thinking. The only simple solution I can think of 
> is not to play their game. Just refuse to buy what they offer to sell.  .  
>
> On Sunday, November 18, 2012 9:47:11 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>
>> globalization can be very beneficial and granted there are many self 
>> centered individuals and corporations that have that have little 
>> concern for others or our world..  but one thing that is coming out of 
>> it they can not control what people thing and desire their world to 
>> be..  Little by little I see people reclaiming the dreams of a better 
>> world. 
>> Oh well what can you expect from an old hippie 
>> Allan 
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 7:43 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> > Andrew is obviously right when one considers where our wealth is 
>> > ending-up.  This group is broadly parochial, white and barely 
>> > understands what it excludes and how.  We are reliant on centralised 
>> > technology that is soon to force us to a format we don't want. 
>> > Rigsy's question is about right.  Previous globalisation was 
>> > colonising and I suspect most of what we are witnessing now is in that 
>> > model.  It would be good to make the move in emphasis Molly suggests, 
>> > but the signs in the underlying business model indicate the opposite 
>> > to me - currently remaining in advertising and making a killing in 
>> > market share.  There is another (dated) form of globalisation in the 
>> > phrase 'workers of the world unite' and it must be clear this has been 
>> > resisted by the powerful other than in their own 'guilds'.  My list on 
>> > what globalisation is would be long and rather vague - including 
>> > teaching foreign students with bare English textbook answers I kn ow 
>> > to be rot.  James Bond has globalised but not decent water, food and 
>> > housing for all - let alone freedom from the kind of idiots on all 
>> > sides who keep such stuff as the Arab-Israeli conflict going. 
>> > 
>> > We need realistic optimism - but this means embracing really bad news 
>> > on climate (worse than we think) and history (much worse than we 
>> > think) in order to see how we get some decent stuff done amongst the 
>> > enemies of open society.  Globalisation is getting very real in the 
>> > sense of telepresence (I could be operated on in Bolton by a surgeon 
>> > in Madras) and other varieties of the embodiment of knowledge that 
>> > will allow remote and even home manufacturing. 
>> > 
>> > Postmodernism (which I regard as the move to modernism we have never 
>> > had) is bringing about a legitimation crisis.  I am broadly (but not 
>> > completely) free of the religious dross taught in youth and chronic 
>> > copy-teachers who told me Julius Caesar invaded Britain in 53AD and 
>> > that humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes like other apes.  To discover 
>> > the extent of ideological dross in my education I travelled.  The 
>> > Internet's supposedly global reach does  not even compare.  How could 
>> > anything be more parochial that Faceflop and Twatter?  What would be 
>> > want to globalise - does anyone ever ask us?  How about freedom from 
>> > work as means of income? 
>> > 
>> > On 18 Nov, 14:11, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> I disagree, Andrew, and take a view more like Alan's.  Globalization 
>> >> occurs when more folks operate from a world-centric life view (not 
>> ego- 
>> >> centric or ethno-centric), more countries are trading goods and 
>> >> services, and more folks have access to goods and services from other 
>> >> countries.  This group is comprised of folks from many different parts 
>> >> of the world.  A good example. 
>> >> 
>> >> On Nov 18, 4:09 am, andrew vecsey <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> > Globalization is reverting to the ownership and control of 
>> everything world 
>> >> > wide by the few. That is the danger of it all. 
>> >> 
>> >> > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:41:31 PM UTC+1, Allan Heretic 
>> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > I think realistically globalization is revering to the access to 
>> >> > > everything world wide 
>> >> > > Allan 
>> >> 
>> >> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM, rigsy03 
>> >> > > <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
>> >> > > wrote: 
>> >> > > > But what does the term "globalization" mean? It is an abstract 
>> term. 
>> >> > > > (Sort of like Alexander's "empire" at his death- to be defined 
>> by the 
>> >> > > > strongest?) 
>> >> 
>> >> > > > On Nov 17, 4:18 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> > > >> I agree with you Saris are very beautiful and believe me that 
>> can get 
>> >> > > >> into the pricey range. Her wedding saris was well over 30,000 
>> Euro and 
>> >> > > >> her mothers was just as bad..  was never told the exact price.. 
>>  but 
>> >> > > >> it was out of the finest silk.. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> There are benefits to globalization ,, unfortunately those 
>> benefits 
>> >> > > >> are easily destroyed by those people and companies that are 
>> extremely 
>> >> > > >> selfish and uncaring...  Greedy is to soft a word for their 
>> >> > > >> activities.. 
>> >> > > >> Allan 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:16 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> 
>> wrote: 
>> >> > > >> > A great question- what is it? Maybe it is what the major 
>> powers/ 
>> >> > > >> > economies tell us it is. Facts betray the huge inequities 
>> among the 
>> >> > > >> > nations/humanity. I would hope we don't lose some of our 
>> differences 
>> >> > > >> > and adopt one style and language. Saris are my favorite to 
>> watch and 
>> >> > > >> > think Indian and Asian women beat out Americans- the men 
>> aren't bad 
>> >> > > >> > either. Remember when we were all so separated and the 
>> "other" seemed 
>> >> > > >> > to look the same- a kind of blindness, I guess. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> > On Nov 15, 8:47 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> > > >> >> The big question is what is globalising.  In part this is 
>> stuff we 
>> >> > > >> >> don't want.  We are still haunted by superstition, sexism 
>> and 
>> >> > > >> >> imperialism.  I'd like to see more of our economies about 
>> building 
>> >> > > >> >> safe communities and see foreign policies and our limited 
>> vision of 
>> >> > > >> >> 'efficiency' as the major bars to this.  Disease is likely 
>> >> > > >> >> globalising, the ability to make WMDs and take part in 
>> manufacturing 
>> >> > > >> >> for war. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> On 15 Nov, 23:34, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > I would substitute ignorance for indifference. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 15, 10:00 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > Untill nationalisn has distinctive meaning, political 
>> and 
>> >> > > cultural, and 
>> >> > > >> >> > > economic, free movement of people can only be a pipe 
>> dream. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > And the "meaning," it must be remembered, is an 
>> emotional - 
>> >> > > mental thing... 
>> >> > > >> >> > > not merely intellectual. That's how phenomenal 
>> dimensions of any 
>> >> > > thing 
>> >> > > >> >> > > extends ... from indifference to emotional values, 
>> covering 
>> >> > > almost 
>> >> > > >> >> > > everything existential in society, politics and 
>> economics ... 
>> >> > > and to 
>> >> > > >> >> > > intellectual conviction, which is singularly absent in 
>> >> > > everything 
>> >> > > >> >> > > experiential that individuals bring into their attitudes 
>> and 
>> >> > > everyday 
>> >> > > >> >> > > decision-making at their present level evolution. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > One of the most intellectual calls was issued by Marx. 
>> No one 
>> >> > > could stand 
>> >> > > >> >> > > up to its rigour ... not the champions and subscribers, 
>> not the 
>> >> > > staus 
>> >> > > >> >> > > quoist rest of the world. Capitalism stays, because it 
>> factors 
>> >> > > in our 
>> >> > > >> >> > > emotional drives, not because it is most just and fair 
>> to the 
>> >> > > weakest in 
>> >> > > >> >> > > our midst ! 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > Au revoir ... 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:15:49 PM UTC+5:30, Lee 
>> Douglas 
>> >> > > wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > Meh!  As you know I'm all for freedom of movement, 
>> live where 
>> >> > > you like, if 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > much of India wish to migrate to The USA and settle in 
>> the Mid 
>> >> > > West then go 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > to it.  However with around only 3-5% of Earth's land 
>> mass 
>> >> > > populated and 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > with an increasing amount of that population living in 
>> urban 
>> >> > > environments I 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > daresay that India has much land of it's own in which 
>> it's 
>> >> > > residents can 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > settle.  Even when much of the land is gone, we are in 
>> fact 
>> >> > > making strides 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > for sea based habitat. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > Over population is a concern, much, much more for 
>> reasons of 
>> >> > > food 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > and energy production though than any reasons of not 
>> enough 
>> >> > > land mass. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > > On Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:15:16 UTC, Allan 
>> Heretic 
>> >> > > wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> Okay there is large sections of farm land in the Mid 
>> west 
>> >> > >  maybe we 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> can help the people of India  resettle into that 
>> area..?? 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> Allan 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Lee Douglas < 
>> >> > > [email protected]> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> wrote: 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Umm myself I can't see globalisation as anything 
>> but a good 
>> >> > > thing.  The 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > sooner we find that our cultural differences do not 
>> matter 
>> >> > > and we learn 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> to 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > judge the individual(as opposed to the group) the 
>> better as 
>> >> > > far as I'm 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > concerned.  Ultimately it will take global working 
>> together 
>> >> > > to sort out 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> the 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > worlds ills. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > Overpopulation is a concern, but to too much of one 
>> at this 
>> >> > > moment in 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> time, 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > there are huge tracts of land still to be settled. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:22:17 UTC, archytas 
>> wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> One of the Faust stories more or less predicts the 
>> >> > > mechanism for the 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> rise of Nazi Germany including the funding. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On 13 Nov, 19:33, Allan H <[email protected]> 
>> wrote: 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Wetlands are very important.  The recovery work 
>> here was 
>> >> > > done 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> centuries 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > ago.. and here we are very eco awe. 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Allan 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Matrix  **  th3 beginning light 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 13, 2012 2:03 PM, "rigsy03" <
>> [email protected]> 
>> >> > > wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > By coincidence of a former discussion, Faust 
>> was 
>> >> > > draining a swamp 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> as 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > part of his spiritual rehab.//Another subject, 
>> >> > > however, would be 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> the 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > wetlands and their role in the ecology. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Nov 12, 6:11 am, Allan H <
>> [email protected]> 
>> >> > > wrote: 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > The Dutch are crazy a and very adept at 
>> working with 
>> >> > > the sea.. 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> and 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > yes 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > it cost massive  supplying its own power 
>> amounts of 
>> >> > > money..  but 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > land 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > recovery is and can be very beneficial to 
>> the 
>> >> > > society.  We have 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> to 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > protect our dunes to protect our country.. 
>>  there is 
>> >> > > very little 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> sea 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > front property unlike both the east ans west 
>> coasts 
>> >> > > of the US.. 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > where the coast is used mainly for private 
>> >> > > residences 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > The dutch have been using green houses for 
>> years 
>> >> > > long before 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Israel,, 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >  the concept of vertical greenhouses id one 
>> for 
>> >> > > producing 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> produce in 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > areas where it is needed like high density 
>> cities 
>> >> > > where space is 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> at 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > a 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > premium and population is at its maximum.. 
>>  trying 
>> >> > > to bring down 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> the 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > cost of food..  and it is based on 
>> hydroponics and 
>> >> > > objectively 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> to be 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > self sufficient power wise..  the idea is 
>> not 
>> >> > > particularly cheap 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> but 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > as for the benefit of society is extremely 
>> valuable. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Some ideas need to be looked at in 
>> relationship to 
>> >> > > self. 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Allan 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 AM, rigsy03 < 
>> >> > > [email protected]> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> wrote: 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > Israel has been very successful with 
>> greenhouse 
>> >> > > agriculture. A 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > nearby 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > restaurant contracted with local 
>> homeowners to 
>> >> > > grow some fresh 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > produce 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > which might catch on. I consider the labor 
>> and 
>> >> > > high water 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> usage a 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > negative, however. 
>> >> 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > On Nov 11, 5:23 am, Allan H <
>> [email protected]> 
>> >> > > wrote: 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> I don't think that will work,,  I think 
>> your 
>> >> > > solution would 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> result in 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> wide spread famine world wide  though the 
>> >> > > chemical farmers 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> are 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> not the 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> best solution  they are not the worst 
>> either 
>> >> > >  from 
>> >> > > >> >> > > >> supermarkets 
>> >> 
>> >> ... 
>> >> 
>> >> read more ยป 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>  ( 
>>   ) 
>> |_D Allan 
>>
>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. 
>>
>>
>> I am a Natural Airgunner - 
>>
>>  Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. 
>>
>

-- 



Reply via email to