for the most part they still are closed over here..  that must make
Holland, Utopia!
Allan

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:58 AM, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
> And stores were closed on Sundays...Maybe that was Utopia!
>
> On Dec 6, 10:58 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> One possible resolution is to change our ideas on childcare.  I'm not
>> sure the focus has to be so much in the home.  From the point of view
>> of women and men wanting to have kids and look after them the system
>> has lots of roadblocks - not least childcare and the times it is
>> available (and cost).  The big snag with creating decent lifestyles is
>> one needs radical change and it's no use waiting for socialist utopia
>> or robot heaven - which would be chimera anyway.
>> Most of my students with young kids found it hard to start lectures at
>> 9 a.m. or attend in the evening or the afternoon after 3 p.m.  At the
>> same time we had staff in the same position very good at slotting
>> their timetables between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.  The provision of
>> childcare was always 'under review' rather than a reality.  The
>> obvious answer is to get more flexibility and childcare in schools
>> throughout the year.  This is a non-starter in 'business reality'.
>>
>> On 6 Dec, 13:06, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Which leads to over-compensation and a new prejudice often/sometimes.
>> > My maternal history spanned biblicals but somehow I was able to be
>> > mostly a stay-at-home mom which even the children were grateful for
>> > and I hope to revive some of those skills with my grand-daughters as
>> > change is on the way. I have truly missed family this last dozen
>> > years. But I do see the additional stress on young women trying to
>> > juggle all those "hats"- I even felt jealous of men dashing off to
>> > their office when I had toddlers plus business on my mind.
>>
>> > On Dec 6, 4:24 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > My own feeling on the work side of equality is we have to do too much
>> > > of it and that there is, in fact, plenty of time in a 40 year work
>> > > span for ten years off to deal with early child carrying and nurture
>> > > (or alternatives).  We are trying to establish equality in an already
>> > > misunderstood and warped system.
>>
>> > > On 5 Dec, 00:39, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > Actually, where I am going to is economics and job creation since
>> > > > women are now equal in western countries and have embraced working
>> > > > outside the home or must be a co-bread-winner due to the cost of
>> > > > living. Plus all must compete with the machine and technology or
>> > > > competitive foreign labor. There are dozens of side issues such as
>> > > > longer life spans, over-population, impact of financial and government
>> > > > mismanagement, etc.//I tend to view the two sexes as a reader/failed
>> > > > writer- as types through history and am not very sentimental though
>> > > > culture continues to send mixed messages even currently.//It's lovely
>> > > > that you had such a positive experience with your own family despite
>> > > > Tolstoy thinking happy families were all alike and possibly not
>> > > > interesting to him as a writer. I think them fortunate although I
>> > > > suppose there is a sense of quest and heroic attempts for those less
>> > > > blessed that warms the soul.//Frankly, the Duchess is reminding me of
>> > > > how ill I was with my first pregnancy with no tlc or hospital- finally
>> > > > my mother-in-law had to take charge. Also another thing- my kind
>> > > > neighbor laughing he was glad he wasn't a woman after his daughter-in
>> > > > law's very difficult/dangerous labor (over 2 days) and delivery. Don't
>> > > > worry- I bit my tongue.
>>
>> > > > On Dec 4, 4:11 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > My Mum and elder sister were pretty strong characters and it never
>> > > > > really crossed my mind to treat anyone with other than the respect I
>> > > > > felt for them.  I see where you re coming from rigs.  The repression
>> > > > > is ongoing in some minds and reality around the world.  We are just
>> > > > > changing our gender bias in 'heir to the throne rankings' so that
>> > > > > female children get equal place.  Quite why we haven't worked out the
>> > > > > real issue has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with
>> > > > > throwing out the Royals I don't know.  If the gender-free inheritance
>> > > > > rules had pertained 100 years before WW1 the British King in 1914
>> > > > > would have been - er - Kaiser Wilhelm!
>> > > > > There clearly are women's issues (men's, gays etc.) - and I doubt 
>> > > > > they
>> > > > > can or should be exclusively derived 'within gender' or sub-classes -
>> > > > > though this doesn't preclude groups talking the stuff through on such
>> > > > > a basis.  I tend to think there has been progress, but I'm not sure
>> > > > > how this has come about, if it has.
>>
>> > > > > On 4 Dec, 04:01, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > Thanks.// I think your reaction can be traced back to the time when
>> > > > > > men were considered the main/only source of security so women were
>> > > > > > more likely to protect that; it really is more complicated, 
>> > > > > > however.
>> > > > > > Earlier homesteading and farming offered a different balance- a 
>> > > > > > very
>> > > > > > important role for the female that gave her a natural or necessary
>> > > > > > equality. But younger couples are working on a balance, as I see 
>> > > > > > it.//
>> > > > > > Was going to bring Hesiod into the mix as he set out a horrid
>> > > > > > description of females in the "Theogeny" (IX, 507-616), written in 
>> > > > > > 8
>> > > > > > B.C.. I vaguely remember the professor saying he probably was an 
>> > > > > > ugly
>> > > > > > farmer who was spurned by women so he took his revenge. But given 
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > date, it is close to the Eden story. Another work came to mind 
>> > > > > > written
>> > > > > > in the 1950's that I have poked around- "America As A 
>> > > > > > Civilization" by
>> > > > > > Max Lerner- particularly Chapter VIII/Section 6- "The Ordeal of the
>> > > > > > American Woman" which captures some of what I was looking for in 
>> > > > > > way
>> > > > > > of explanation for my parent's generation. I think he captured it- 
>> > > > > > for
>> > > > > > a man. :-)
>>
>> > > > > > On Dec 3, 8:34 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > Your new account is off moderation rigsy.  I've always been 
>> > > > > > > struck
>> > > > > > > that women talking and acting for themselves are not reflected 
>> > > > > > > in the
>> > > > > > > literature and that some of the characters most dangerous to 
>> > > > > > > equal
>> > > > > > > opportunity are female.
>>
>> > > > > > > On 2 Dec, 06:27, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > On Saturday, December 1, 2012 10:30:37 AM UTC-6, archytas 
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > The Body Class and Work Disability Discrimination Equality 
>> > > > > > > > > of Opportunity Identity Politics Multiculturalism 
>> > > > > > > > > Objectification Parenthood and Procreation Power Race Rape 
>> > > > > > > > > Reproduction and the Family Science The Self Sex and Gender 
>> > > > > > > > > Sex Markets Trans Issues These are just some of the topics I 
>> > > > > > > > > thought I could put forward in teaching gender issues in 
>> > > > > > > > > management. They underlie the bland politically correct 
>> > > > > > > > > policy matters. One thing has always occurred to me as 
>> > > > > > > > > missing in every debate I can remember. Women are as bad as 
>> > > > > > > > > men as managers. I equate equality with hospitality (always 
>> > > > > > > > > two-sided at least) and suspect we don't realise behaviour 
>> > > > > > > > > is much less to do with gender or the individual than we 
>> > > > > > > > > think and perhaps has little to do with rationality. I don't 
>> > > > > > > > > think we see the wood for the trees on gender.
>>
>> > > > > > > > How unlike anything EVER mentioned to me as a girl or young 
>> > > > > > > > woman. I suppose we depended on family tradition, religion and 
>> > > > > > > > etiquette as we were groomed for marriage via mystery, 
>> > > > > > > > motherhood and homemaking. Groomed, indeed!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>
>
>



-- 
 (
  )
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.


I am a Natural Airgunner -

 Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly.

-- 



Reply via email to