yes sports is dangerous stuff ,,steroids are not uncommon  also
carried on though pro sports  oops I forgot they buy off the drug czar

I do not see why you really don't look into what is going on instead
of just spout republican rhetoric..


On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:59 AM, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
> I should have added independence from family, sex and drinking though
> the latter two are primed in highschool. Also, students can read and
> write but many need (forgot the term) classes to improve their skills.
> Not sure if handwriting/grammar is even a factor anymore. // Then
> there's sports- though Obama thinks it is dangerous stuff along with
> gun ownership so soon American men/women will be civilian wimps. But
> the military is an alternative to college/poor employment
> opportunities so there is always an answer unless one considers
> military service a risk and who would do that?
>
> On Jan 28, 8:57 am, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Considering that many movers and shakers were lucky to get a
>> highschool education back in the '20's and '30's and that some recent
>> innovators dropped out of college one does start to question the
>> process. Add up the loan debt, as well. College may be a form of the
>> caste system, networking or opportunity/income leveler. I repeat my
>> stated opinion that college is a respectable place to park ones
>> children for some parents. It used to be a place to meet a mate but
>> now a career is the object since two can no longer live as cheaply as
>> one. Often college entrants still cannot read or write plus now they
>> have expectations of a certain level of hype and bedazzlement.//
>> Teachers burn out in some subjects because it's 24/7- just in
>> correcting essay exams and term papers plus checking for plagiarizims,
>> etc. and because they are expected to be sort of a pseudo-parent/
>> nursemaid/sex-object/inspiration all while getting published to prove
>> their value/worth to the institution.//Once one learns to read and
>> comprehend they can teach themselves most anything. A library card
>> will do...
>>
>> On Jan 28, 6:39 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Strangely enough Lee I do experience that!  Brian Clough should have
>> > been England manager!  One finds a lot of arrogant ignorance in
>> > classrooms and a lot of stereotyping by teachers and students.
>> > Teaching is often a weird experience and difficult to drop from the
>> > system - something pretty important to let learning take place.  I
>> > don't use textbooks unless I've given up on a class that won't fend
>> > for itself (some demand spoonfeeding and find discovery learning
>> > terrifying).  It's easy enough to get classes round to looking at work
>> > motivation in terms of the content and process theories of 'chapter
>> > three' and regurgitate what's there.  To a man jack they'd all give up
>> > work if they won the lottery, suggesting a rather different theory.
>> > I'm sure the books are mostly wrong and that more than that the need
>> > for basic texts is a combination of bad teachers and commercial
>> > pressures to get bums through seats.  I try to met people do what
>> > interests them, what they want to find and express - but as in all
>> > human activity there is a problem with people promising 'your own way'
>> > who don't mean it.  And it's much more difficult today to defend
>> > students who don't toe to the party line.  Is it possible to 'respect
>> > ignorance' but at the same time fail it?  What is a person who wants
>> > to stay ignorant doing in a learning environment?  Further down the
>> > line one often finds research leads one to the conclusion that what's
>> > taught is rubbish - something one might also achieve just in reacting
>> > to a teacher one doesn't like without doing the hard work!  Our
>> > schools claim to be doing a better job than ever - but walking Max
>> > through litter and evading broken bottles left by the products of
>> > school education I'm not so sure.  Still smirking on your comment me
>> > old China.
>>
>> > On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > Ahhh but what if majority opinion was to sway towards your way Archy?
>>
>> > > On Sunday, 27 January 2013 22:56:22 UTC, archytas wrote:
>>
>> > > > Much majority opinion, when tested, contains almost no evaluation,
>> > > > nothing on alternative views (other than suspicion) and no critique or
>> > > > originality.  Many of the people involved are remarkably decent,
>> > > > hospitable and so on.  The majority view on the science I've done is
>> > > > non-existent - people don't have the requisite languages.
>> > > > Anthropology throws up majority views across cultures that are frankly
>> > > > barking (as in our own histories and probably now).  We might walk one
>> > > > of Andrew's thought parks and look back from the near future and
>> > > > realise neo-classical economics really was a barking mad control fraud
>> > > > that held us back from world peace - or that it saved us from a world
>> > > > once again dominated by religion.
>>
>> > > > On Jan 27, 5:54 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > If you asked someone in the herd, if they considered themselves to be
>> > > > > part of the herd, or if their view was their opinion, I suspect that
>> > > > > you would hear a view entirely different than the opinion you just
>> > > > > voiced, Andrew.  An opinion filled with judgments presented as fact
>> > > > > (or a an attempt of such,) twisted words and thinly veiled 
>> > > > > accusations
>> > > > > are always weak argument.  Words like arrogant and vain are value
>> > > > > judgments.  Herd mentality is a documented sociological phenomenon.
>> > > > > Most operating under herd mentality do not understand that the basis
>> > > > > of their thinking or opinion is fear.  I would speculate that most
>> > > > > political rhetoric is aimed at forming herd mentality with fear.  At
>> > > > > least, all the political ads in every city I have ever lived in the
>> > > > > US.
>>
>> > > > > On Jan 27, 12:23 pm, andrew vecsey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > Heard mentality or herd mentality is not an opinion. It is just
>> > > > blindly
>> > > > > > following the loudest voice heard either out of fear or out of  not
>> > > > having
>> > > > > > an opinion but taking it from the herd you chose to follow in 
>> > > > > > order to
>> > > > > > conform.  The majority opinion in not necessarily the loudest 
>> > > > > > opinion
>> > > > you
>> > > > > > hear. The loudest opinion usually comes from an arrogant, vain and
>> > > > > > disrespectful person who is power hungry and has enough money for a
>> > > > > > brainwashing campaign. Like a dictator who disregards majority
>> > > > opinions as
>> > > > > > mindless.
>>
>> > > > > > On Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:12:08 PM UTC+1, Molly wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > Of course, I meant herd mentality.  Now, off to work!
>>
>> > > > > > > On Jan 27, 10:00 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > before the judgments fly any further, a differentiation between
>> > > > heard
>> > > > > > > > mentality and majority thinking might be in order.  It is 
>> > > > > > > > possible
>> > > > > > > > there there is truth in what Andrew and Allan are saying, but
>> > > > gross
>> > > > > > > > generalization, paradoxically, leads to a narrow view, one 
>> > > > > > > > that is
>> > > > > > > > unable to consider another. Heard mentality can indeed, be
>> > > > dangerous,
>> > > > > > > > and a great manipulator can take advantage.  History bears this
>> > > > out on
>> > > > > > > > many occasions.
>>
>> > > > > > > > On Jan 27, 4:35 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > what ever andrew
>>
>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:55 AM, andrew vecsey <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > Except when the majority opinion happens to agree with your
>> > > > own
>> > > > > > > opinion. In
>> > > > > > > > > > my own personal opinion, anyone who thinks that the 
>> > > > > > > > > > majority
>> > > > opinion
>> > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > mindless shows clear signs of arrogance, vanity and
>> > > > disrespect. All
>> > > > > > > opinions
>> > > > > > > > > > should be respected. Is that not the basis of democracy?
>>
>> > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:44:57 PM UTC+1, Allan 
>> > > > > > > > > > Heretic
>> > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> the majority opinion is the easiest one to manipulate as 
>> > > > > > > > > >> it
>> > > > has no
>> > > > > > > > > >> idea what it is.  because of that it is the easiest to
>> > > > control
>> > > > > > > being
>> > > > > > > > > >> both mindless, disorientated with no where to go and no 
>> > > > > > > > > >> idea
>> > > > of
>> > > > > > > what
>> > > > > > > > > >> it believes as well as willing to believe  the comforting 
>> > > > > > > > > >> lie
>> > > > > > > rather
>> > > > > > > > > >> tan the simple truth.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:57 PM, andrew vecsey <
>> > > > [email protected]>
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >> > The majority opinion is the most FAIR, most JUST, most
>> > > > > > > comprehensive....
>> > > > > > > > > >> > opinion. You can not call it the best, the most 
>> > > > > > > > > >> > correct, or
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > most
>> > > > > > > > > >> > moral
>> > > > > > > > > >> > etc...because those evaluations are personal. Majority
>> > > > opinion is
>> > > > > > > not
>> > > > > > > > > >> > personal.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> > On Saturday, January 26, 2013 2:15:25 PM UTC+1, archytas
>> > > > wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> .......I think we know
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> what the right things to do are but are scared of our
>> > > > impotence
>> > > > > > > -
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> understanding more of why might help.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> On Jan 26, 10:14 am, gabbydott <[email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > In present tense it means acknowledging the massive
>> > > > amount of
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > illnesses,
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > deaths and general deformation of humanness because 
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > of a
>> > > > > > > protestant
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > work
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > ethics that serves very much the one and less the 
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > many.
>> > > > I hope
>> > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > can
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > decipher my shorthand by now.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > 2013/1/26 Allan H <[email protected]>
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Yes and no one is more or less past tense the 
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > other is
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > > going,
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > one killing was based off racial superiority,, the
>> > > > other
>> > > > > > >  killing
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > is
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > based off religious superiority,
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > Whats the difference..    ??
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, gabbydott <
>> > > > > > > [email protected]>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > The other serving as a better example of 
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > wickedness
>> > > > is a
>> > > > > > > classic,
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > Allan.
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > 2013/1/26 Allan H <[email protected]>
>>
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> A better example Riggs   and sadly enough  is 
>> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> Islam
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > > today's
>>
>> ...
>>
>> read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>



-- 
 (
  )
|_D Allan

Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.

Of course I talk to myself,
Sometimes I need expert advice..

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to