I am not barking at andrew.. 

تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others

-----Original Message-----
From: gabbydott <[email protected]>
To: minds-eye <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: What could the internet be?

Use your segmentation ability and go to you Zombie thread if you have to
leave your shit out, Allan! And stop barking at Andrew!

2015-02-17 19:33 GMT+01:00 Allan H <[email protected]>:

> Dream on Andrew, sorry and I already your are going to say I am full of
> shit,,  by it is okay..  all own source is good for is ease in hacking.. I
> will watch people do the delusional twisters.
> A few people will always maintain machine language you are lucky because
> they are not interested in delusional dead.. beware through he people who
> will employ them are rue control freaks. The safety net is within numbers
> and time, the segmentation ability is where the secret lies..
>
>
> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: andrew vecsey <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 5:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: What could the internet be?
>
> You can get a better explanation of the blockchain from the internet than
> I can give you. But as I like to simplify complicated things, I will give
> it a try. The blockchain is a public ledger that is kept by volunteers. The
> volunteers document transactions made by users.The ledger is verifyied by
> consensus of the volunteers. The the only way that ledger can be falsified
> is that 51% of the volunteers that maintain the ledger all have to agree to
> a falsified version of the ledger. The users broadcast a transaction they
> want to include in that ledger, and the volunteers transcribe that
> transactions in that ledger.  There is no centralized point of control, as
> the ledger is distributed by the volunteers.  The transactions can be
> Bitcoins, a cryptocurrency that apparently can not be falsified due to the
> encryption it uses, or any other transactions, like ownership of assets, or
> contracts. The blockchain is refereed to as a "trust-less system" in that
> you do not have to trust a centralized authority to maintain that ledger,
> as there are none. The protocol that is used for the blockchain is an open
> source program that prevents anyone compromising that protocol without
> everyone else knowing about any changes that might compromise it. The
> entire system is of course very complicated. The main aspects that allow
> such a system to be implemented is the mathematics of cryptology, the
> internet, the distributed network of computers, and geeks that maintain
> that network not because they want to hack or control it, but because they
> want to keep it honest. I hope that helps.
>
> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 3:56:22 PM UTC+1, Gabby wrote:
>>
>> I am interested in empowerment tools. What is the blockchain technology,
>> Andrew? First what it is and then what is does, okay? Thanks.
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015 schrieb andrew vecsey :
>>
>>> I have been thinking about your post Niel.
>>> The internet connects people via their computers. That is very
>>> empowering. especially to the owners of centralized computers that offer
>>> porn, entertainment,  commerce and information. It is however the
>>> decentralized form of the internet that is truly empowering, enabling
>>> people globally to freely communicate and share information without the
>>> control of centralized powers.  The blockchain technology is the most
>>> empowering. It frees people to make money transactions without banks, legal
>>> transactions without lawyers, and allows people to vote and voice their
>>> opinions without politicians.
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 3:41:22 PM UTC+1, archytas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Most of my use of the internet concerns researching pretty dire
>>>> academic papers and books through still largely restricted access.  It's
>>>> much cheaper than buying the stuff directly, particularly as 99% of what
>>>> shows up is dross.  I've played with the rest to find out what is there.
>>>> Search is a big plus compared with rooting through stuff in a university
>>>> library.  Now, much google search just turns up dross I don't want.
>>>>
>>>> In an academic project we are interested in what is on the net
>>>> generally - in terms of how much of general consciousness this represents.
>>>> Rational discussion is a tiny part of what is on the net.  Techies spend a
>>>> lot of time looking for cut and paste code and ways we might automate this
>>>> sweep.  There is a background idea that we are looking for new ways to do
>>>> 'expert knowledge' on the metaphor of people not being able to build cars
>>>> but able to drive them with a bit of training.  My own bad is 'big data' as
>>>> a new language that would bring a different speed to human discourse and
>>>> potentially control of the means of production.
>>>>
>>>> Lately, I'm interested in the lack of a business model for anything
>>>> except trash.  I can join a site where a couple of young women will send me
>>>> off-the-peg clothes on approval to ensure my sartorial elegance, though
>>>> don't.  There are plenty of interesting Moochs, but I don't have time.  I
>>>> bank n line and have the joy of never seeing a bank clerk. Shopping can be
>>>> done in the same manner as shops don't interest me at all.  My insurance
>>>> renewals are always 30% higher than I can get the same cover for via one of
>>>> the broker sites on the day.
>>>>
>>>> I do electronic teaching.  So I'm no longer racked by whatever diseases
>>>> undergraduate classes try to kill me with.  And I never see a boss or have
>>>> to attend a useless staff meeting, or have my classes flooded as the
>>>> students discover I'm an easier touch and tell jokes.  The work is more or
>>>> less pre-prepared and my timetable is not changed at ridiculous short
>>>> notice and I don't have to take time to teach kids from other classes, at
>>>> my door because they can't get anywhere with the guy supposed to help.
>>>>
>>>> I can watch television and films through illegal sites, but would
>>>> really prefer to pay for channels where I could select from much wider
>>>> material without packaging.  The current business model encourages loads of
>>>> channels with the same (usually old) dross, or stuff like Netflix with only
>>>> 1% I'd want to see and don't want to pay to support.  Sports channels
>>>> require me to pay for soccer I don't want.  Tony has done more for me in a
>>>> few minutes (neglecting his production time) than Sky Arts bores ever
>>>> could.  We lack a business model of actual choice.  With one, insanestream
>>>> news and other entertainment, the crap science pornography of the BBC,
>>>> Discovery and so on, would be things of my past.  In chronic business
>>>> terms, I wonder how they do market segmentation at all.  I am sick of Blue
>>>> Peter (kids programme here) presentation.
>>>>
>>>> One can imagine plenty of people like the best through this group
>>>> wanting something very different and something large enough not to be a
>>>> part of when time presses and so on.  Uber, properly supervised against
>>>> racist drivers, could bring very radical change - I meet few who can
>>>> explain why - though we have not yet worked out that technology could
>>>> massively reduce what we currently call work and planet burning.  In the
>>>> meantime we can't even set up a discussion group without Gabby (and
>>>> everyone really) worrying on the curtain shades.  Give us a twirl then
>>>> girl, like one of those doxies Bruce Forsythe used to encourage.  I can see
>>>> something of a business model, starting with Chris' 'attractors'.  The
>>>> eventual key is content for a sophisticated audience - remembering very few
>>>> people do education without any kind of accreditation pay-off and the means
>>>> to pay for organisation does not move easily from free.  Current strategies
>>>> are advertising and the begging bowl.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> topic/minds-eye/JQ9a6NzpVYU/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/JQ9a6NzpVYU/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to