...whereas all your teaching us seems to be centred around the idea how
even Allan's most zombie-like statements should be  embraced to reach
enlightenment...
Am 27.02.2015 10:31 schrieb "archytas" <[email protected]>:

> Certainly not RP.  Only the bit about feeling linked to what you say on
> god was at all relevant to you.  Tony raised the narc point and we do
> suggest some component of this may be necessary in creative living.  That
> pathological individuals are attracted to self-development and religion and
> can actually be very dangerous was the point.
>
> On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 7:50:51 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> I hope, Neil, that you don't think that I am a narcissist.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:57 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you RP - I feel a link to what you say, though don't feel it
>>> necessary to define god.
>>>
>>> Tony raised narcissism, which we might connect to destiny.
>>>
>>> One form of  Narcissism is a little understood personality disorder
>>> which is increasingly showing up in our leaders across political, business,
>>> sporting, psychological and spiritual institutions. Indeed narcissism and
>>> narcissistic is increasingly being used to describe the mass cultural shift
>>> to a “self” obsessed culture where there is rampant consumerism, the
>>> pursuit of power, excesses, and the abuse of others in the pursuit of these
>>> ends. We all need a healthy dose of narcissism, as else we would not back
>>> ourselves in life, nor have a healthy sense of self. There are healthy
>>> forms of narcissism.  Pointing to and ridiculing one's own might well be
>>> healthy.
>>>
>>> The dangers of narcissism are discussed here - http://www.
>>> energeticsinstitute.com.au/page/narcissistic_group_dynamics.html
>>>
>>> One problem in recognising religious diversity is the idea that all
>>> people are honest about religious motivation and profession.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 4:07:16 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Neil, why think of God in the usual way, think of him as something
>>>> before the big bang from which the universe emerged. Think of him as the
>>>> mind which contained the unmanifest which became manifest as the universe.
>>>> We know that there is predetermination but why think that he has
>>>> predetermined, think that it all naturally happens and evolution is a
>>>> natural predetermined process. Why should God be aware like us, as the
>>>> source of all he need not be bound by the limits of consciousness and can
>>>> very well be unconscious. Have faith in such a God and your destiny.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:19 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Postmodernism is supposedly a set of critical, strategic and
>>>>> rhetorical practices employing concepts such as difference, repetition, 
>>>>> the
>>>>> trace, the simulacrum, and hyperreality to destabilize other concepts such
>>>>> as* presence*, identity, historical progress, epistemic certainty,
>>>>> and the univocity of meaning.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tony could be seen as replaying the liar's paradox here.  To admit to
>>>>> hypocrisy may be to admit the truth.  For some postmodern writers, one has
>>>>> to go further than any set of analytic rules and recognise madness at work
>>>>> and restriction of dialogue to safe metaphors like Freud's Oedipal family,
>>>>> when the world of real desire is very different (quite a few writers were
>>>>> gay).
>>>>>
>>>>> Skepticism, over many centuries, has taught a kind of suspension of
>>>>> judgement to a point when one works with many different arguments.  Humour
>>>>> can often be the only thing left after rigorous doubting, a kind of
>>>>> self-depreciation in the face of conflicting evidence and themes.  Those 
>>>>> of
>>>>> us who 'know nothing' still know how to jibe "and even this is to know 
>>>>> more
>>>>> than them, those who claim to know everything".  This doubting process, in
>>>>> science, comes to at least a temporary end in crucial experiments that
>>>>> anyone, in principle, can demonstrate.  This is rarely the case in 
>>>>> ordinary
>>>>> living.
>>>>>
>>>>> Descartes had it that we could undergo these difficult skeptical
>>>>> processes with faith in a warm, benevolent god.  It would be good to feel
>>>>> such a presence, but I don't.  He had the instruments of torture to 
>>>>> contend
>>>>> with for that matter.  There is a presence of thinking on god without
>>>>> ancient fable, much as there are ways of thinking on economics without the
>>>>> dominating manners of neo-classical fantasy.  The admission of perplexity
>>>>> is something of a start, but has something of the vulnerability of sensory
>>>>> deprivation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested in the still mystical point of argument resolution
>>>>> after doubt that is not merely conviction, superiority.or promises so 
>>>>> vague
>>>>> they are empty.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 9:12:31 PM UTC, facilitator wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course Allan! My narcissism is baptized in hypocrisy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I espouse to walk in the light and yet there are plenty of
>>>>>> "Neighbors" I don't treat better than myself.  I claim spiritual
>>>>>> superiority and yet find myself in constant need of attitude adjustment. 
>>>>>>  I
>>>>>> want world peace but have done little to push that round peg into all of
>>>>>> the square holes I have encountered.  Maybe only 1 out of three times do 
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> turn the other cheek.  And, I am definitely superior to most of the 
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> I meet in this life.   My spirit is ill equipped to take on a higher 
>>>>>> plane
>>>>>> of existence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/TplDVV1N_zw/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to