Allan, in subjective matters proving your point is difficult if not
impossible, I cannot prove my logic about God or the Source of creation. If
people think that I am illogical, I can do nothing about it. I don't find
your views correct, yet they are your views and to you they are logical and
as such acceptable to me.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> See RP  we both agree that God existed before the creation of the
> universe.. beyond that your theology and logic becomes questionable..
>
> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RP Singh <[email protected]>
> To: Minds Eye <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 5:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Presence
>
> Neil, why think of God in the usual way, think of him as something before
> the big bang from which the universe emerged. Think of him as the mind
> which contained the unmanifest which became manifest as the universe. We
> know that there is predetermination but why think that he has
> predetermined, think that it all naturally happens and evolution is a
> natural predetermined process. Why should God be aware like us, as the
> source of all he need not be bound by the limits of consciousness and can
> very well be unconscious. Have faith in such a God and your destiny.
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:19 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Postmodernism is supposedly a set of critical, strategic and rhetorical
>> practices employing concepts such as difference, repetition, the trace, the
>> simulacrum, and hyperreality to destabilize other concepts such as*
>> presence*, identity, historical progress, epistemic certainty, and the
>> univocity of meaning.
>>
>> Tony could be seen as replaying the liar's paradox here.  To admit to
>> hypocrisy may be to admit the truth.  For some postmodern writers, one has
>> to go further than any set of analytic rules and recognise madness at work
>> and restriction of dialogue to safe metaphors like Freud's Oedipal family,
>> when the world of real desire is very different (quite a few writers were
>> gay).
>>
>> Skepticism, over many centuries, has taught a kind of suspension of
>> judgement to a point when one works with many different arguments.  Humour
>> can often be the only thing left after rigorous doubting, a kind of
>> self-depreciation in the face of conflicting evidence and themes.  Those of
>> us who 'know nothing' still know how to jibe "and even this is to know more
>> than them, those who claim to know everything".  This doubting process, in
>> science, comes to at least a temporary end in crucial experiments that
>> anyone, in principle, can demonstrate.  This is rarely the case in ordinary
>> living.
>>
>> Descartes had it that we could undergo these difficult skeptical
>> processes with faith in a warm, benevolent god.  It would be good to feel
>> such a presence, but I don't.  He had the instruments of torture to contend
>> with for that matter.  There is a presence of thinking on god without
>> ancient fable, much as there are ways of thinking on economics without the
>> dominating manners of neo-classical fantasy.  The admission of perplexity
>> is something of a start, but has something of the vulnerability of sensory
>> deprivation.
>>
>> I am interested in the still mystical point of argument resolution after
>> doubt that is not merely conviction, superiority.or promises so vague they
>> are empty.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 9:12:31 PM UTC, facilitator wrote:
>>>
>>> Of course Allan! My narcissism is baptized in hypocrisy.
>>>
>>> I espouse to walk in the light and yet there are plenty of "Neighbors" I
>>> don't treat better than myself.  I claim spiritual superiority and yet find
>>> myself in constant need of attitude adjustment.  I want world peace but
>>> have done little to push that round peg into all of the square holes I have
>>> encountered.  Maybe only 1 out of three times do I turn the other cheek.
>>> And, I am definitely superior to most of the people I meet in this life.
>>> My spirit is ill equipped to take on a higher plane of existence.
>>>
>>>  --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to