On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 8:53:53 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote:
>
> We might already be living under the tyranny of our gene machines RP. 
>
Double that Neil ! 

And I am not sure who would be more heartless, man or machine. Man has 
already proven the depths of itself.  I say we give machine a chance. 

Really, what difference is there between mechanical and biological?  One 
uses metal the other organic but in the end its all molecules and atoms.

>
>
> On Tuesday, 10 March 2015 00:22:49 UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> As long as man is sane he will not destroy humanity though he might loot 
>> it for self aggrandizement, But some contribution to the human pool will 
>> remain, We can't be that sure with machines and they must always remain 
>> subservient to us otherwise we will be at risk to lose the very freedom for 
>> which we are making so much effort. Again, my contention is know your 
>> nature and potential before you make machines that surpass our intelligence 
>> because cold and calculating freaks might not be loyal to us, rather live 
>> in tyranny of humans than under the rule of heartless machines.
>>
>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to