Why is rsync a problem? Where is the bottleneck in the protocol or the code 
implementing it?
Specifics!
SAR is antiquated doesn't give the info you really need. Using a linux system? 
Use procallator and feed resulting collected data to ORCA. Better yet, use 
DTrace or at least truss.  Compile rsync with profiling code -- use Sun Studio 
12 it runs on Linux as well as Solaris and its a free download. 

From a network protocol perspective rsync is quite good. If your network 
capacity is so large that it exceeds bandwidth or IOPs of your disks you 
probably can afford better disks or a more efficient disk storage layout. 
Are mirrors like nic.funet.fi running multiple gigabit WAN connections?  If so 
they could sure demand stream more than a bunch of SATA2 disks can provide. 

Without performance data its a waste of time to argue against rsync 

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect

Reply via email to