Ive heard that idea however I disagree with who ever started that
theory.. It makes no sense... because if the star or director or
players sign it IN MY opinion it enhances the experience , the
provenance, and the entire cinema experience... for example... my son
likes Star wars... and he would carry a insert to shows and get the
starsto sign it.. I think he has Prowse and mayhew and anthony
daniels... not only does it give a rich memory but also a storywhich
is what memorabilia is about.. to conjure memories of the
experience.. the poster alone is a piece of advertising art lacking
personality, howevere the signed poster like a bokk shows that
principals in the artistic endevor where in a time and place and
touched the artifact in person.. not to mention if they spoke to the
signee..
a friend of ours was a bit player in Ghostbusters Two.. and he was
able to get us a signed 1 sheet by the entire cast minus
sigorney...they even made cute remarks and signed in silver paint
pen... as Huge GB fans we found that signing as making the poster a
OVer the Top piece of memorabilia far exceedding just a simple common
poster... as for value... its a one of a kind as how many where
signed by the entire main cast??? also the face we know its 100%
original as our friend was in the movie.. we also where able to get
signed books by Roddy Mcdowell when he received a doctorate at BG
university... again my son brought a planet of the apes doll and also
a Gum card that he signed... ironically the local TV news station
filmmed him signing Tommys stuff so its on footage showing it... and
the most important part was my son was able to meet some heavies in
the biz in person to leave a everlasting memory and inspire his own
dreams of making movies..years from now when he looks back.... he
will remember .he was able to meet adam west, jerry lewis, roddy
mcdowell,many star wars people like Rick Mccallum and the kid in the
movie... matthew Broderick to name afew...also he met musicians and
they signed his bass pickgaurd.. like bootsy collins, les claypool,
the funk brothers, and others... autographs just freeze a time and
place of the memorie and crystalize the experience....To me as a
dealer and a collector a signed piece in any form far exceeds just a
commonoff the shelf item....that gos accross the board// letters and
signed clothing its all Good and its history of the celebrity and of
the art...
who ever started the idea that autographs do not embellish the
posters worth should really consider what memorabilia is all about
and has meant from the getgo kindest regards, Tom
>
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] Autographs on Movie Posters
>Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:48:07 -0400
>
>>
>>From my earliest years of collecting movie posters, it was a common
>belief
>>among collectors and dealers alike that probably stars' autographs
>on movie
>> posters or lobby cards definitely de-valued the piece. In fact,
>on many
>>occasions restorers would be requested to remove the autograph when
>the
>>poster was linen-backed. Of course in rare occasions...for
>instance, if the
>>poster was autographed by Jean Harlow or Carole Lombard or Greta
>Garbo...this
>>might not be the case. But in most instances, I've always heard
>that an
>>autograph definitely does not make a movie poster more valuable...
>>
>Rick
>>
>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>
>___________________________________________________________________
>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>
>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>
>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content
>.
>>
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
