[Ron]
> strictly speaking, matter does come before ideas, it's the basis of
> ideas it's the common referent to
every living things
[SA]
Are the four levels to be evolutions structure?
Thus, inorganic first, organic second, and so forth.
If so, then inorganic does come before ideas even on this macro-scale.
It is quality first, then static patterns. That was the first split. I
believe we once called that the first MoQ principle. Quality splitting
into dynamic and static.
[Ron]
I think it makes logical sense, the Quality event as you say then
dynamic/static. The only place
I hesitate is the assumption of the quality event in relation to the
strictly inorganic, It makes
me ask the question : does quality exist without a subject? I can
understand value patterns from
attractive and repulsive energy forces in relation to dynamism making
sense. but Quality
understood as Quality from a subjective POV, I don't know, this is
where I bring up
the idea of subjective value vs. objective value ...they're both similar
but are they
the same? is value still a broad umbrella term? is this where the
objectivist and the
subjectivists in the MOQ discuss still battle? any thoughts?
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's
updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
