> [SA previously]
> If I may...
> You can have a concept about anything and it is
> not separate based on what is called 'a part of
> you', 'one with you', 'oneness', 'one-with-nature',
or
> ecosystem experience, namely the woods, etc... It
> is these non-ego experiences that DM is referring
to.
> The distinct experiences are static, but these are
> dynamic anyways. Distinct doesn't refer to
> separate.
> How does you pointing out "...unconceptualized
> experience is sensual distinction." change or speak
> differently than what I've just said?
> [Ron]
> Hello SA,
> when you say
> "The distinct experiences are static, but these are
> dynamic anyways "
> what do you mean?
> thanks
It is what I call: dq is sq, and sq is dq.
Here's a quote from the SODV paper as follows:
"In this diagram you will notice that
Dynamic Quality is not shown in any block. It is in
the background. This seems the best way to represent
it. It is not only outside the blocks,
Page 14
it pervades them but it goes on where the blocks leave
off."
- SODV; Pirsig
This is how intellectual values last as long as
it is valued. Social values as long as they are
valued. Organic... valued. Inorganic... valued.
Change is the motto here. This part of the article
goes on to say as follows:
"The blocks are organized in the order of
evolution, with each higher block more recent and more
Dynamic than the lower ones."
- SODV; Pirsig
Does this help?
thanks.
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on
Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
