[Ham] > metaphysical principle 2) Everything that exists is differentiated (by > nothingness).
Is 2) = 2') Nothing differentiates anything that exists. If not, why formulate 2) in this way? [Ham] > I know you will complain that I have no empirical justification for such a > cosmology, Such a cosmology is justified by its explanatory value. In order to have explanatory value, it must be understood. Is there anyone else who understands your cosmology (or any part of it.)? If not, I would starts its justification there. Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
