> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:20:51 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect
>
> At 03:15 PM 12/16/2007, you wrote:
>
>>Hello everyone
>>
>>> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:41:11 -0500
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: [MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> What do you think of making the Intellectual Level subject/object
>>> only, and creating a MOQ level above?
>>
>>Hi Marsha
>>It doesn't jibe with the way I understand the MOQ. Like the SOM, the
>>MOQ is a theory, an idea, a static quality intellectual pattern of
>>value. That seems pretty simple. I see no reason to posit any
>>further levels. It only complicates matters.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>
>>Dan
>
> Thanks Dan,
>
> That's the way I see it too. Maybe if Bo's problem can be better
> understood, a better way to address it will surface.
Hi Marsha
I notice that I often become manic about certain ideas and worry them like an
old dog worries a bone but I tend to grow tired after a while and like the old
dog let go. I admire Bo's tenacity but have nothing more to add that would
serve to change his mind. He's been gnawing this bone for nigh on 10 years now
and I am still not sure who he hopes to convince save himself or what
difference said convincing will make. His jaw has got to be tired though.
Dan
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
