Bo, Gav, Peter and Marsha, to name a few ... Bo, Gav, I think Peter states this better. I cannot equate SOM to Intellect. I could use the idea of "based on" in a historical / evolutionary sense, but not in any fundamental "underlies" sense.
I call if "GOF Intellect" as you know. A place where intellect started a journey, to use Peter's language, but where its leading edge is clearly much more enlightened. Bo, you display the same blind spot, when you accuse some of us in applying a SOMist dualism to a Quality / MOQ split. We use the language of our SOMist culture to debate the issue, but our thinking really has moved on. (Bo you make a good point about the intellect / intelligence confusion ... but I don't think it's relevant to the point here.) Ian On 12/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gav > > 17 Dec. you wrote: (in you no-caps style) > > > i think that the subject-object split underlies the intellectual level. > > That's it! But why not say that is IS the intellectual level? Is there > a difference? > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
