Dmb: James and Dewey are non-SOM philosophers and that's my main point. Their work is proof that there are non-SOM alternatives at the intellectual level.
Ron: The angle is that they are SOM philosophers, they were born and bred in western culture, they use English, a subject object case language to describe non-analytic alternatives. They project a paradigm outside Of the cultural normative thought structure, James and Dewey offer Radical inclusion to analytic empirical method. They contend that no Data is strictly objective and factual, It is all colored by cultural And personal bias. It is the realization that we can not trust ourselves to objectively Evaluate any data absolutely, we may however reduce error by applying A radical empiricism. It is a refinement of SOM methods, it is truer via James own convictions Of any new idea's test is the compatibility with former ideas. _________________________________________________________________ Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista(r) + Windows Live(tm). http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_ CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
