Hej Christoffer
Can't say for sure but I think you're the first Swede here besides me, at least
for a very long time.
Christoffer Ivarsson wrote:
> Se, here is the problem. After considering Bodvars arguments about SOM
> being the intellectual level I thought about the thoughts that was before
> that, and if they could be "thoughts of the social level". I'm not sure yes,
> but It seems they could from where I stand now.
>
> For if thoughts as such is present before the emergence of the forth
> level - and we know they where, as indeed thoughts is a function of the
> brain - a static biological pattern - the way the capacity of thought is
> used is determined of what level is currently in control (as well of course
> of the level of evolution the said brain is at) then the function of the
> brain, the thoughts could at a given moment be totally controlled by the
> social level and the brain interpret everything is registers from the frame
> of reference of the social level - if that level was all that was around.
> The thoughts would then be, I guess, biological and social reactions and
> interpretations of DQ.
You're getting there, just forget for a moment what others have been saying
about *when* the 4th level emerged.
There's a difference between:
1. "When did the first 4th level pattern emerge?"
... and ...
2. "When did 4th level arguments start having an impact on human civilization?"
Question 1 deals with the metaphysical construction of our universe. What kinds
of stuff is our universe made of?
Question 2 deals with human history. It presumes a human civilization and
discusses how a metaphysics can be applied to human thinking and interaction, a
fascinating subject I'm sure but not what we should be talking about here.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
