Jorge,

Please continue.

Marsha


At 12:37 PM 2/6/2008, Jorge wrote:

>  Commenting on my Post on continuity of MOQ levels (as
>opposed to discrete, not continuous) Steve writes:
>
>"I think this project of putting the levels on a
>continuum is doomed from the start because the levels
>to my thinking are categorical rather than scalar."
>
>Steve, if your thinking is correct and MOQ levels are
>categorical, as opposed to scalar, why to call them
>Levels in the first place?
>
>  Before starting exploring on the approach of Fuzzy
>Sets to MOQ levels, I looked up the definitions of
>level; just to make sure. The American Heritage Dict.,
>which, I assumed, reflects the common use of words in
>the US, had the following senses:
>
>a.Relative position or rank on a scale: the local
>level of government; studying at the graduate level.
>b.A relative degree, as of achievement, intensity, or
>concentration
>2. A natural or proper position, place, or stage
>3. Position along a vertical axis; height or depth
>4.  a.A horizontal line or plane at right angles to
>the plumb.
>      b.The position or height of such a line or plane.
>5.A flat, horizontal surface.
>==========
>
>So, if  in MOQ levels we don't mean "levels" in the
>ordinary, common use of the word, why not to call them
>something else?
>
>  We grant to authors of fiction a free hand with words
>but, when writing Philosophy, we require from them to
>be careful in their choice of words. It seems to me
>that using "levels" when meaning distinct categories
>is an unfortunate choice; even more so if one talks
>about "higher levels" dominating "lower levels".
>
>
>
>       __________________________________________________________
>Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


*************
DEFINITION of  Marsha, I, me, self, myself, & etc.:   Ever-changing 
collection of overlapping, interrelated, inorganic, biological, 
social and intellectual, static patterns of value.

The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only 
the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony 
without end.



     

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to