At 04:32 AM 2/9/2008, Bo wrote:
>Why I don't speak about value so much is that I take it for
>granted. (ZAMM)
>
> No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise
> tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When
> people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious
> faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it's always
> because these dogmas or goals are in doubt.
>
>it's the application of Value I'm interested in.
>
>Enough
>
>Bo
Greetings Bo,
Hmmm. There is theoretical mathematics and there is applied
mathematics. Are you saying that the RMP's MOQ theory does not work
when applied to real life experiences? Are you saying this
theoretically, or can you offer a demonstration a failure?
Marsha
*************
DEFINITION of Marsha, I, me, self, myself, & etc.: Ever-changing
collection of overlapping, interrelated, inorganic, biological,
social and intellectual, static patterns of value.
The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only
the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony
without end.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
