Ron, I'm going through the log jam of some these posts that I haven't yet read due to the high volume of posts that came through here last week. This is very interesting what you said, and I'm gald you responded. I believe this may help move along a certain discussion. I don't have time at the moment to get to this, but I will try, perhaps this afternoon, to respond back. This line-of-thinking, I believe, slightly emerged in the last post you sent to me as well. I see where your coming from now, but I'll respond later.
Thanks. SA > Ian: > > ... same reminder as for Steve & Marsha ..... > > > SA: No need to remind here. I'm sure with Marsha, > too. Wasn't it Tittuvuls or however you spell > his/her > name that reemerged this over two or three months > ago. > Marsha found this interesting, and I did too. > Nobody > wanted to discuss this quality=value=experience, but > Marsha keeps moving it along, and I've been trying > to > move this along, too. Glad to see you've jumped in > to > move this along, as well. I wonder if anybody else > gets it due to the lack of response to this. It > definitely places the orientation in way that is > not-mind-centered, not-individual-centered, > not-human-centered, not-thought-centered, > not-social-centered, not-organic-centered, > not-inorganic-centered. Have I named all the places > where people seem to state reality is based? - in > the > past week or so? I remember when reality was based > on > the heavens providing the order, and man was the > center of the universe, then along came the > sun-centered universe, and now-a-days astronomy > states > the center of the universe is everywhere, thus, > astronomy goes on to state - the center is nowhere. > (This is how my astronomy textbook from the > university > put it.) What a very Zen way of stating events. > > Ron: > SA, If this is what you have gleaned from my > statements, then > I am truly sorry for being unable to state my > thoughts in an > understandable manner to you. I was not positing a > center, it was merely > an observation > About how humans perceive this non center reality. I > get it. This is > where I've been coming from. I said in a way, > conceptually, reality from > a human perspective is all we really can know about > reality by way of > this quality=value=experience. But does this > quality=value=experience= > reality itself? In my opinion it is not, experience > is not reality. It > is a form of > Reality, it is reality filtered, condensed and > exaggerated , by the > human > Body , certainly we do not sense nor understand it > in it's entirety As > it flows. > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
