> Chris
> Within a MOQ world-view we would say
> "Inorganic, Biological, Social and Intellectual
> responses to Quality" a
> SOMist would say thoughts.
SA: I really must ask. Have you read Lila? The
whole book, and I quoted many passages recently that
discuss how inorganic=quality, biological=quality,
social=quality, intellectual=quality, dynamic=quality,
also, I quoted where Pirsig mentions each level is
dynamic and static quality.
Quality=value=moral=experience was something else I
quoted at length recently. I'm going to need to start
ignoring what seems to be what is called ignoring of
most of Pirsig's writings, especially when rebuttals
to these quotes come back as and I paraphrase, "Well,
Pirsig left this to us, to hammer out." Bo likes the
first couple pages of ZMM and declares the rest of
Pirsig's writings to be flawed. This is not I saying
this. This is Bo's own words. Time for me to move on
to something not as stuck, thus, to avoid a quality
trap mentioned in ZMM.
white snow,
brown mud,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
