SA > Chris: >> So you can see I am not anti-intellectual at all. I >> want the MOQ to work. >> Regarding your quotes, I know them, and I like them. >> But what am I supposed >> to do with them? Think about them when I meditate? >> No, not that. Have them >> in mind when I discuss the MOQ? But I do! In my view >> of the MOQ everything >> is quality. Static and Dynamic.
> SA: Ok. I see the main hitch to you not > understanding what I'm saying. You regard the > intellect as s/o only. I regard the intellect as > being able to intellectualize in ways that are not > only s/o. Anything that doesn't fall into your s/o > intellect instantly becomes a social pattern. > Mysticism to you is some kind of 'religion' for you > incline towards logical positivism, my guess. Well, mysticism, a hard defined word, but religion is quite definitely a social pattern in my book. Zen perhaps too, but what it's aiming at, and other religions too perhaps would in my MOQ understanding be Dynamic Quality, or a Quality awareness unbroken by static patterns. That's fine, and well incorporable with a SOL MOQ. I'm just saying, that when I practice Zen I should not think in this manner, then I will get further away from Zen. Am I making myself understood? >SA: > This is a question, near the current topic, but > slightly not the same. Do you really think what > happens on this forum is evil and as such, a lie? > Please explain. I don't understand why you would think this? I love this discussions, and I believe that the MOQ, if properly used could bring about real Betterness. > SA Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
