At 02:15 AM 3/24/2008, Bo wrote: >But it's a disappointment that so few understand the "Sutherland" >variety much less the MOQ's in its entirety which is that the said >scientific (objective over subjective) attitude is MOQ's 4th. level (and >the mythological attitude its 3rd.) In this level context there were no >"man" until the social level's language that coined the term as well as >"giving name to all the animals", but no-one started to explore nature >because there was (still is) no nature at the 3rd. level, "culture/nature" >is one of intellect's many dichotomies)
Greetings Bo, Since, Bo, we're all trapped into using a language that is subject/object oriented, and since you cannot know what type of understanding another individual holds (especially separated from the s/o language), where do you get the ability to make such a judgement as 'disappointment'??? Are you the next all-seeing, all-knowing Messiah? We all care about the MOQ as much as you do. Can you not realize this??? Marsha Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
