Chris,
And don't forget to push somebody on your way up
and just say your free to do so cause liberty in the
U.S. = as long as your gaining a profit we'll do
anything to let you gain that profit even push people
on your way up the U.S. dream ladder. Oh, but to
prove your gaining some kind of profit slip some $ in
the pocket we'll make it legal and call it oh... call
it hmmm, yeah! We'll call it lobbying and it'll be all
legal and stuff.
By the way, I've noticed the media has kept track
of how much the presidential canditates have in their
"War Chest" (yep that's what it's called) and as long
as the candidates have millions of dollars then they
can continue to run for president. Hilaries gone into
debt, but hey that's the U.S. way, go into debt,
borrow from China.
SA
SA
Chris:
> I see you are having fun here, but correct me if I'm
> wrong - is Platt really
> attacking the principle of balance in the market on
> the grounds of the US
> system? Because - Surprise Buddy! - balance isn't
> really the word to use
> there, and it hasn't been even close since
> Roosevelt's days I'd say. I
> suggest you study the Nordic Model, especially in
> the 60's and 70's, a model
> of balance if any, and a models that doesn't let
> some 10-16% of the
> population in a country live beneath the poverty
> line. It's a lucky thing
> you have got that American Dream that so easily
> fools people into thinking
> that it's OK for millions of people in the richest
> country in the world not
> to be able to feed and clothe their children or
> themselves. So when Platt
> says that ""balance" is out of whack by a ton. " I
> say - no f***ing shit?
> There never was balance. You have got the American
> Dream - climb to the top,
> make it on your own - so what if some people don't
> make it, starve to death
> or have to turn to crime to survive in their
> American Dream - it's liberty!
> Where is the Quality in that? The Human Quality?
>
> //Chris
>
> > [Platt]
> > Your self-proclaimed "balance" is out of whack by
> a ton.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > Oh right. Because I don't want to return the
> 1890's, it must mean I want
> > everyone to waste time, develop biofuel and have
> food riots in poor
> > countries.
> > Right.
> >
> > [Platt]
> > Maybe if you had a sense of balance at all you
> would check your history to
> > acknowledge the many benefits of
> industrialization.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > Already said so.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
