[Chris] Yep, Arlo I'll let you take yet another one of these. [Arlo] Great. :-) Happy happy joy joy.
[Chris] The historian in me reels at so much that Platt writes that I have a hard time coming up with anything at all. Funny thing is, I have been here now for a while, and as soon as we hit this area - at any point - all you get from Platt is this radio-talk. [Arlo] Its been like that since the day I joined. And you can look into the archives to see it extend back further than that. I hope you see too the great distortion always deployed. The charge is "in extolling the virtues of balance" I somehow deny, or even argue against, the benefits of free competition. Its as if you are not arguing for 1890's markets, you are an evil "statist" who wants regulation to smother everything. "Balance", as I am sure we are in agreement, recognizes the gains drawn from both the wealth production of the market, and the gains drawn from social regulations ensuring workplace safety. But that's never part of the Limbaughian dialogue of ridiculous dichotomies (as you've seen from the same tactic used in the individual-collectivist threads). Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
