Ian:
> (1) I know you don't "go after" anyone either - that
> was my point,
> sincere people don't, they seek truth.

SA:  Thanks Ian.  And that's what I've sincerely tried
with Bo, but he turns his nose up.


Ian:
> (3) A year is recent in MoQ evolutionary terms,
> believe me ;-)


SA:  true

Ian:
> But yes
> Bo has been pushing his SOL interpretations
> (passionately) for much
> much longer than that - he sincerely believes it;
> despite the periodic
> frustrations I believe he is also generally sincere
> in arguing for it

SA:  Everybody's sincere in their arguings.

Ian:
> - and yes it does take two (or three) to decend into
> a (recent) spat
> ... (My long term view of Bo's arguments with
> anyone, me included, is
> that there is still an element of talking past each
> other - which only
> dialogue can ever fix. My hope is nailed to the
> "historical" mast.)


SA:  Bo never dialogues - and that's part of my whole
point.
 

Ian:
> Irredeemable however is quite different from
> un-redeeemed (for however
> long) ;-) One comes with hope, the other ...

SA:  Some say that's why we live many lives.

Ian: 
> I'm not getting at you (or Bo), just answering your
> questions. I can
> shut up on this one if you like - just say.

SA:  Clarity needs to brought on this situation, and
thus, you have help provide.

SA


      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to