----- Original Message -----
From: "Krimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Chance
Krim: It allows an purely naturalistic universe in which things
evolve slowly from the bottom up.
DM: Does anyone here disagree?
[Krimel]
I suspect some do but do they? Anyone? Anyone?
[Marsha]
I do not like the top-down or bottom-up model. I like the Net Of Jewels
Model: The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is
only
the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony
without
end.
[Krimel]
Could just be me but this makes not a bit of sense. I can't for the life
of
me see the middle way between top down and bottom up leading anywhere.
Greetings Krimel,
I haven't taken the net of jewels model to represent the middle way. It's
how I see it, 'interconnected reflections', or interconnected, overlapping
patterns. I have never been terribly comfortable with a hierarchical
structure because it forbids the possibility of overlapping categories.
Though, it is favored in the sciences, isn't it? And very patriarchal.
Besides, where is it you want to be lead? Who's on top? How utterly
boring?
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
