Hi Krim
The philosopher John D Caputo in his book 'On Religion'
reminds us before modern SOM we did not see the animate
and the inanimate distinction as matching an inner and outer
distinction of subjects and objects:
"it was the opposite. They regarded 'inanimate' things
as contracted to themselves, whilst 'animate' things
overflow their bodily limits and reach out into the world".
MOQ likewise can have no such dualist simplicity as
you seem to wish to hang on to.
Maybe too subtle for you all this if you want to see
things in black and white: animate/inanimate.
David M
Quoting Krimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But his unfortunate use of terms allows you
and David M. and Platt to claim that atoms and rocks have wants and needs
and desires.
Platt claims no such thing.
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
