Ron --
Ham: I respect your aim and your concepts, I just hope You understand that I am not attacking you just exploring the finer aspects of difference.
[Ham, previously]:
IMO, SOMETHING is needed to provide the MoQ with a metaphysical foundation.
[Ron]:
Perhaps this is something we can work on together.
Quite possibly.
Maybe I have a similar theory that I am so comfortable with that It's something that's a non-issue for me that it might be for others. Perhaps I have a blind spot in this regard.
Ron, I'd like very much to hear your theory. The more I know about where you're coming from, the better I can phrase my concepts in a way you will understand.
Incidentally, may I offer a suggestion concerning your e-mail fomat which may be troubling other respondents? I don't mean to nit-pick, as I'm guilty of careless typos myself, but it is not necessary that you begin each line with a capital letter. You need to capitalize only when it is the first word of a sentence, not the beginning of every line of type. (That will make it easier to read and copy your previous posts )
I've asked before that you give me a synopsis of your personal worldview, but your response has been to reinvent Pirsig. I would suggest that we express our concepts freely, in our own terms, and then apply them to the MoQ scheme as appropriate. In that way, we may even be doing RMP a favor!
I've been spouting Essentialism in the last few posts. Why don't you start the ball rolling for a fresh start?
I appreciate your continued interest in my ideas, Ron, and look forward to hearing yours.
--Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
