Ham: Ron, I'd like very much to hear your theory. The more I know about where you're coming from, the better I can phrase my concepts in a way you will understand.
I've asked before that you give me a synopsis of your personal worldview, but your response has been to reinvent Pirsig. I would suggest that we express our concepts freely, in our own terms, and then apply them to the MoQ scheme as appropriate. In that way, we may even be doing RMP a favor! I've been spouting Essentialism in the last few posts. Why don't you start the ball rolling for a fresh start? I appreciate your continued interest in my ideas, Ron, and look forward to hearing yours. Ron: Ham, I think I have solved the auto correct problem, sorry for the inconvenience. To be perfectly honest Ham, my purpose is to be the best parent and husband I can be, I achieve that by being the best person I can be. It's all about relationships. If I lost my wife and children, I don't know how secure I'd be in purpose. I'd have to re-evaluate once more using the tools I have accrued. So to conclude, my world view is ever evolving and dynamic. It changes as I speak. I stay light flexible aware and ready. Because of the things I have gone through in my life, I am quite comfortable with not knowing how or why. The sheer fact that I am is enough for me. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
