> > SA previously: I'm going to be blunt - the plains spoken, as if
> we aren't, to get to
> > what I'm saying - for you go on to say something
> here I don't think has to
> > do with what I posted.
Marsha:
> Maybe you know the meaning of this sentence, but I do not
> find it plain-spoken at all.
SA: That's all I said. I said I'm going to be plains spoken about this. You
said something, I think, that has nothing to do with what I posted.
Maybe I'm being a bit too much in my words, in other words, too lengthy in
how many words I use, and your being a bit too much into how deep your trying
to read into what I'm saying.
> > SA previously: No and Yes. I was saying that if this moq-forum
> is a forum about
> > morals (quality/value, you know), then how best to
> examine them in these
> > real time events brought up by Squonk, dmb, McWatt,
> and what have you.
> > What you might say is arguing is another's debate.
> Isn't this philosophy?
Marsha:
> Of course it can always be this or that.
SA: yeap, of course.
> > Marsha previously:
> >> By all means decide who is
> >> right, and who is
> >> wrong, and why?
> > SA previously: I'm not even focused on who's right and
> who's wrong - at all. That
> > might happen, but it might snow tomorrow too.
> It's about what we do
> > everyday, and now something that is tied into everyday
> life much more than
> > brains-in-vats and even my abstractions from time to
> time, arises from the
> > earth and Horse steps in and says stop? Yes... ?
Marsha:
> Yours is just one more opinion. Late enough to sound
> moralizing.
SA: This doesn't sound like anything that has to do with what I posted, but
not stopping you from talking. I don't have a quibble with what you say. So,
"of course". Other than the "late enough to sound moralizing". Was there a
scheduled time and date we were supposed to meet? Missed that message.
Marsha:
> I have always thought Horse should have the last word
> because he's the
> moderator. But maybe it should be you.
SA: Of course Horse is the last word. I did write that post to Horse, and
asked him why. So, again, we could say, "of course".
> > Marsha previously:
> >> But I'd bet it's about feelings.
> >> Anyway, sorry to be so
> >> wrong.
> >
> > SA previously: This might be a separation your delineating and
> others delineate from
> > their daily lives and what happens on this forum. I
> say no separation.
> > Never has been one.
Marsha:
> Huh?
SA previously:
> When has anything NOT been about feelings?
Marsha:
> This is probably true.
SA: You might have just answered your own "Huh?" in this statement.
Marsha:
> wood chipper,
woodpecker,
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
