Hi Krim
The MoQ, if properly framed, avoids this dualism as
one might do in Chaos theory by stating that order is not distinct from
disorder but is a subset or type of disorder. Thus SQ is not ontologically
distinct from DQ at all. They are both manifestations of Quality.
DM: I think that is dead right about how MOQ avoids dualism.
But what is the status of all the SQ and the levels we can seem
to order them into? I think that we can see all the SQ as a
plurality of patterns and levels (a many) and hence SOM
is neither dualist or essentialist, but is a quality-experience monism
with a plurality of SQ as a Many coming out of the One of quality.
That's how I see it working. I would also add what is the status
of what liew outside of experience? Clearly we do make sense
of experience with ideas about what we have not experienced.
Many examples: black holes, potential depressions, the future,
the pre-human past, what lies beyond our corner of the universe.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
